Path: csiph.com!news.redatomik.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Newsgroups: linux.kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH perf/urgent] perf tools: Fix the code to strip command name Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 18:30:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: Jiri Olsa MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-URL: http://acmel.wordpress.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) Sender: robomod@news.nic.it List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 34 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway X-Original-Cc: Jiri Olsa , David Ahern , Namhyung Kim , Peter Zijlstra , Taeung Song , Jin Yao , lkml , Ingo Molnar X-Original-Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 13:28:39 -0300 X-Original-Message-ID: <20170424162839.GC2742@kernel.org> X-Original-References: <20170420092430.29657-1-jolsa@kernel.org> <20170424154450.GB2742@kernel.org> <20170424160645.GA4120@krava> X-Original-Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Xref: csiph.com linux.kernel:1629766 Em Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 06:06:45PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu: > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 12:44:50PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Em Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 11:24:30AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu: > > > Recent commit broke command name strip in perf_event__get_comm_ids > > > function. It replaced left to right search for '\n' with rtrim, > > > which actually does right to left search. It occasionally caught > > > earlier '\n' and kept trash in the command name. > > > > > > Keeping the ltrim, but moving back the left to right '\n' search > > > instead of the rtrim. > > > > perf/urgent? > > > > > Fixes: bdd97ca63faa ("perf tools: Refactor the code to strip command name with {l,r}trim()") > > > > [acme@jouet linux]$ git tag --contains bdd97ca63faa > > perf-core-for-mingo-4.12-20170411 > > perf-core-for-mingo-4.12-20170413 > > perf-core-for-mingo-4.12-20170419 > > [acme@jouet linux]$ > > > > It is just in tip/perf/core, will put in acme/perf/core and push to Ingo > > in my next pull req. > > sure, I did not check.. just thought it's urgent from time POV ;-) :-) I took it too literally then, tried to apply it to perf/urgent, it failed, scratched my head... Anyway, applied. - Arnaldo