Path: csiph.com!1.us.feeder.erje.net!2.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!news.unit0.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!news.servidellagleba.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: linux.kernel
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 33/33] mm, x86: introduce PR_SET_MAX_VADDR and PR_GET_MAX_VADDR
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 15:10:02 +0100
Message-ID: <ti1uO-Rx-41@gated-at.bofh.it>
References: <tbRy9-5mq-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tbRyb-5mq-61@gated-at.bofh.it> <tbU30-6Np-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <tdhgS-252-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tdi3f-2DN-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: robomod@news.nic.it
Approved: robomod@news.nic.it
Lines: 51
Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway
Xref: csiph.com linux.kernel:1593363

2017-02-21 15:42 GMT+03:00 Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 02:54:20PM +0300, Dmitry Safonov wrote:
>> 2017-02-17 19:50 GMT+03:00 Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>:
>> > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 6:13 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov
>> > <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> >> This patch introduces two new prctl(2) handles to manage maximum virtual
>> >> address available to userspace to map.
>> ...
>> > Anyway, can you and Dmitry try to reconcile your patches?
>>
>> So, how can I help that?
>> Is there the patch's version, on which I could rebase?
>> Here are BTW the last patches, which I will resend with trivial ifdef-fixup
>> after the merge window:
>> http://marc.info/?i=20170214183621.2537-1-dsafonov%20()%20virtuozzo%20!%20com
>
> Could you check if this patch collides with anything you do:
>
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170220131515.GA9502@node.shutemov.name

Ok, sorry for the late reply - it was the merge window anyway and I've got
urgent work to do.

Let's see:

I'll need minor merge fixup here:
>-#define TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE (PAGE_ALIGN(TASK_SIZE / 3))
>+#define TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE (PAGE_ALIGN(DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW / 3))
while in my patches:
>+#define __TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE(task_size)        (PAGE_ALIGN(task_size / 3))
>+#define TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE             __TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE(TASK_SIZE)

This should be just fine with my changes:
>- info.high_limit = end;
>+ info.high_limit = min(end, DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW);

This will need another minor fixup:
>-#define MAX_GAP (TASK_SIZE/6*5)
>+#define MAX_GAP (DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW/6*5)
I've moved it from macro to mmap_base() as local var,
which depends on task_size parameter.

That's all, as far as I can see at this moment.
Does not seems hard to fix. So I suggest sending patches sets
in parallel, the second accepted will rebase the set.
Is it convenient for you?
If you have/will have some questions about my patches, I'll be
open to answer.

-- 
             Dmitry