Path: csiph.com!1.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Ard Biesheuvel Newsgroups: linux.kernel Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 23:10:03 +0100 Message-ID: References: Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ZAsDvZyqQ2LzIqzofg2wtwJQc+DyC0pqlO5Wdnncwxg=; b=Rzjq+kCBDFT3jW9Kb3fldn/rOeLwPd8IUF8aHyGPJigHLZavBsehSTBF9MjsQF5YoP CY6syeZVs3RMJNmDGx4III6AoWyBaQcCGb1DPoqzn2C3lvy1r+XI9HdQvixdVv/mXhq1 i+p6UbU8IrHVabwbFYkqJtzBd5O8CTuquVnGU= X-Google-Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ZAsDvZyqQ2LzIqzofg2wtwJQc+DyC0pqlO5Wdnncwxg=; b=cbm1t1w+sR+noyPKe30U3iCYAXIh+0svduTh/Sx8+usiOS+wtCmCvgxpD2heyG++6F v21LbrgeRUnhbwVLbFHgzsepvnZETsqHOeKv3j1uX91LSrhfAAzYO/BIhVVJYTirC78T HfSq0Rib6nFERmhMEQtFOwBLBxb4zd0BIAm2nEyTvCknCvvnHZDuCwso1h/dTF3NFcQN 5Cvt+DwakqVXILJqzS/8oSPdZq/hjch4q/P3weSIcv8wjXYwbWHezvfOJhiJ0vfIclOZ sZTWawcIl7CSEOZ4ubLDWNmehDsgzLEtGB0B6pFeVjihcjqzqoG2D05h8ZYWAHOzNGLU QKqw== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKFBS6+8v8JSPsPvxuPEo+wcz5FwK5VwE+WRPI/eC1hjP2xS6u+inIGhhmptVEorh7stA4qNz1QF2eqOgkL X-Received: by 10.36.207.212 with SMTP id y203mr5150784itf.63.1484776944868; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 14:02:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: robomod@news.nic.it List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 64 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway X-Original-Cc: Stephen Rothwell , "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" , LKML , Herbert Xu X-Original-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 22:02:24 +0000 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <20170118163225.5776630e@canb.auug.org.au> X-Original-Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Xref: csiph.com linux.kernel:1562223 (+ Arnd) On 18 January 2017 at 20:44, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 12:32 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20170117: >> >> The arm-soc tree gained a conflict against the arm tree. >> >> The amlogic tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree. >> >> Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 3676 >> 4511 files changed, 139928 insertions(+), 85028 deletions(-) > > Crypto now fails on arm allmodconfig: > > arch/arm/crypto/Makefile:25: These ARMv8 Crypto Extensions modules > need binutils 2.23 or higher > arch/arm/crypto/Makefile:26: aes-arm-ce.o sha1-arm-ce.o sha2-arm-ce.o > ghash-arm-ce.o crct10dif-arm-ce.o crc32-arm-ce.o > AS [M] arch/arm/crypto/aes-neonbs-core.o > CC [M] arch/arm/crypto/aes-neonbs-glue.o > /home/paul/git/linux-head/arch/arm/crypto/aes-neonbs-core.S: Assembler messages: > /home/paul/git/linux-head/arch/arm/crypto/aes-neonbs-core.S:817: > Error: bad type for scalar -- `vmov q1h[1],r10' > /home/paul/git/linux-head/arch/arm/crypto/aes-neonbs-core.S:817: > Error: bad type for scalar -- `vmov q1h[0],r9' > /home/paul/git/linux-head/arch/arm/crypto/aes-neonbs-core.S:817: > Error: bad type for scalar -- `vmov q1l[1],r8' > /home/paul/git/linux-head/arch/arm/crypto/aes-neonbs-core.S:817: > Error: bad type for scalar -- `vmov q1l[0],r7' > /home/paul/git/linux-head/arch/arm/crypto/aes-neonbs-core.S:818: > Error: bad type for scalar -- `vmov q2h[1],r10' > /home/paul/git/linux-head/arch/arm/crypto/aes-neonbs-core.S:818: > Error: bad type for scalar -- `vmov q2h[0],r9' > > [many more similar scalar errors deleted] > > The 2.2.3 warning was there in the past, but it wasn't fatal. I'm using > an older binutils 2.22 from the kernel.org crosstool stuff. > > Seems sfr's builds get the same issue: > > http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/12910945/ > > A mindless "git bisect run" comes up with: > > cc477bf645736739e69d31fdf715281ef0dd5f9b is the first bad commit > commit cc477bf645736739e69d31fdf715281ef0dd5f9b > Author: Ard Biesheuvel > Date: Wed Jan 11 16:41:54 2017 +0000 > > crypto: arm/aes - replace bit-sliced OpenSSL NEON code > > Maybe binnutils 2.22 is finally too old? > I am not sure what the current policy is (Arnd?), but if all errors pertain to vmovs from scalar to NEON register, I suppose I could work around it. But perhaps the best solution is the simplest one: not build the module for < 2.23, like we do for the Crypto Extensions modules.