Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!news.unit0.net!news.panservice.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Sebastian Frias Newsgroups: linux.kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] bitops: add equivalent of BIT(x) for bitfields Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 11:40:02 +0100 Message-ID: References: Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=laposte.net; s=mail0; t=1481020296; bh=PijJUo3tktTJ5MVxDxrLz0cvK2dbUo9bUIdbJmVjeXA=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=i8sh9GKw2PDkppIjxQ6cxZ9pCahimNQSiV+K4BktpK3TZb3+TsltCSa3lOmb72T/k hpy/aXhBTPc9TnGVl5gdw24Y8tgPdrXpsL9UEHsJXLKV3o2xoPyR7ohaWiT5/ZOIzR csA1Z06p2k2J1g89QHfyDmbpB7Zxok2lAEdIaA0is+KAFr1QOLZeoFFhJ9u4TN4oWi Uik44nuKp1/2g44/vFebYQNCzXCnZ2BhmSn5i+SreafZe8+UxFG7yDauzbbZkVKcfk on+NTpmc+xCzrkW03N6vw7dsJSIt+wWHWCzyttDVIgPaZ4Qaxa0fTmsxnuTKaAXQF8 +WtWuuqelX4uw== User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Vr-Srcip: 92.154.11.170 X-Vr-Score: -100 X-Vr-Cause-1: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeelfedrhedtgddthecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhf X-Vr-Cause-2: ihhlvgemucfntefrqffuvffgnecuuegrihhlohhuthemucehtddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhs X-Vr-Cause-3: ucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefuvfhfhffkffgfgggjtgfgsehtjeertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefu X-Vr-Cause-4: vggsrghsthhirghnucfhrhhirghsuceoshhfkeegsehlrghpohhsthgvrdhnvghtqeenucfkphepledv X-Vr-Cause-5: rdduheegrdduuddrudejtdenucfrrghrrghmpehmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdphhgvlhhopegludej X-Vr-Cause-6: vddrvdejrddtrddvudegngdpihhnvghtpeelvddrudehgedruddurddujedtpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhep X-Vr-Cause-7: shhfkeegsehlrghpohhsthgvrdhnvghtpdhrtghpthhtohepghgvvghrtheslhhinhhugidqmheikehk X-Vr-Cause-8: rdhorhhg X-Vr-Avstate: No Sender: robomod@news.nic.it List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 41 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway X-Original-Cc: zijun_hu , Sasha Levin , Andrew Morton , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Linus Torvalds , Mason , Maxime Coquelin , Harvey Harrison , Borislav Petkov X-Original-Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 11:31:36 +0100 X-Original-Message-ID: <55a33378-e235-08da-251e-fff432be72fb@laposte.net> X-Original-References: <196dd443-e3c7-2c37-1dd1-bc1d249ea2fb@laposte.net> X-Original-Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Xref: csiph.com linux.kernel:1536840 On 05/12/16 18:48, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 2:36 PM, Sebastian Frias wrote: >> Introduce SETBITFIELD(msb, lsb, value) macro to ease dealing with >> continuous bitfields, just as BIT(x) does for single bits. > > If it's a bitfield, why not calling it that way? > I don't know if you saw v2 (or v3 for that matter), but the name was changed to GENVALUE. Also a small use case was added to the commit message: "Introduce GENVALUE(msb, lsb, value) macro..." "...This is useful mostly for creating values to be packed together via OR operations, ex: u32 val = 0x11110000; val |= GENVALUE(19, 12, 0x5a); now 'val = 0x1115a000'" > So what about BITFIELD(start ,size), like arch/tile/kernel/tile-desc_32.c has? > >> SETBITFIELD_ULL(msb, lsb, value) macro is also added. > > Confused by the need for a "value" parameter... "value" is the value to be massaged (shifted, masked) into a [msb:lsb] bitfield. > > Gr{oetje,eeting}s, > > Geert > > -- > Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org > > In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But > when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. > -- Linus Torvalds >