Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: york sun Newsgroups: linux.kernel Subject: Re: [Patch v4 3/9] driver/edac/fsl-ddr: Separate FSL DDR EDAC driver from MPC85xx Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 02:50:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: Borislav Petkov Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nxp.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=OGQrTMwVAa1DVlanaLtAti8ypYSG7GBww/I7ZqjUNgQ=; b=U3eG4095UgSLODT1DNGx8pw43fHmRKTfd7bs8A1MKYkQUnbSMX9pNvzNvjQ6sQrlb7VGzXp9TXUewVdcN07Ubc3iykSuVOmaMAVH35g2BHY+Xg/cbzyL/OUH4ce8hTt6hXSDwnir3r8b8aq+7rTWJApbo3ExyYV0t9E5XwW0JXM= Thread-Topic: [Patch v4 3/9] driver/edac/fsl-ddr: Separate FSL DDR EDAC driver from MPC85xx Thread-Index: AQHR89VgMyiQ5lf0M0WZuL07gU8aag== Reply-To: york sun Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US Authentication-Results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=york.sun@nxp.com; X-Originating-IP: [192.88.158.1] X-Ms-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-ID: 0fd55a1f-bc7f-4694-007f-08d3c223ef7a X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1;VI1PR0401MB2637;6:iP6Kq2qbIz6aw5snxGNwU5SnCXerFdL76wpPJGr7rSBecLmQtnnTLOCSNVX2XJ/oaRjGZqZ7UwCRM0CnOYi6KU6FeD2Ya7KxL5dgGbSiN98C61JGTkjEjfer1msdO+1g7VA8HmX153z+5N7M9dXfFyc8L81KfpYGayq68qDaP5qSxPZWFcZZT2fO7ql5qRLnnO95dGheoNnx7XnxfuO/seQM5YOd6fawRNqXJqYC8EiLVcibRe8i/ZIgpcuDy3O9BR1LQzORZMlu0bAhTFCw1PJv7gTMi28hFx98+M7iPaV/qpN+T/Q7ZcPRIv9o9dvQWxn9o7qzSlskO1YRNVCuuw==;5:nDefsKhlm2nLDyD5jS4UkfOEOuN/nZA5U+GNV//CccWqgEQHWexSLiXZCicNq1Hd8T3V/AWyqFQXs5axdiHw9uC5lWgFQ0z0/n5/1j2AL7xLXZiVF1bGCCU/I8scSQ8QKYvoXYHvgEMuYLuqtSC1tA==;24:LSOyokglGQhvPTgjKs0oSlSER29SrUlT1A/HlLITXHMuN7s9/nra6MV54zFoCTVqDgRzAw2ulTE1zZDirTNCDTzsJtcFGwhSiGoFhX1NQk0=;7:Ils+qjcv9QM7RWo3q6aPflaqBgXmxZlULi+kH5kP85nDwAWABf+ZtmU4IW3eUeMxbapjmKr6fimaWMR1Y294YQ4HpEQJGOm1E8Kr85Kdwq08VdjX+UBCWo264WfAuX0JLGaBPLk7WSOupP5PLkeLt1XPH/FwUOB4R980icvB9x7KzPanwACp0V9UUSg5sg+gvLIdOjGYyJzgyyHi7XizsA8QiY1OwbX15IPJjPFJRphOku+6GdUcRAMhsFcE9dTa X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:VI1PR0401MB2637; X-Nips-SMTP-Inbound: xFSL-EDGE X-Microsoft-Antispam-Prvs: X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:(185117386973197)(788757137089)(84791874153150); X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Cfa-Test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(6040174)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026);SRVR:VI1PR0401MB2637;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:VI1PR0401MB2637; X-Forefront-Prvs: 0031A0FFAF X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(7916002)(24454002)(189002)(199003)(377454003)(54534003)(77096005)(50986999)(7696003)(2900100001)(68736007)(8936002)(9686002)(15975445007)(586003)(3660700001)(7736002)(54356999)(101416001)(110136002)(5002640100001)(43066003)(2906002)(74316002)(7846002)(10400500002)(4326007)(81156014)(53806999)(11100500001)(76176999)(305945005)(33656002)(105586002)(81166006)(8676002)(6116002)(3846002)(102836003)(3280700002)(76576001)(87936001)(86362001)(122556002)(97736004)(189998001)(106356001)(66066001)(19580405001)(106116001)(86152002)(3450700001)(19580395003)(217873001);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101;SCL:1;SRVR:VI1PR0401MB2637;H:AM4PR0401MB1732.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com;FPR:;SPF:None;PTR:InfoNoRecords;MX:1;A:1;LANG:en; Received-Spf: None (protection.outlook.com: nxp.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originatororg: nxp.com X-Ms-Exchange-Crosstenant-Originalarrivaltime: 11 Aug 2016 20:13:16.5138 (UTC) X-Ms-Exchange-Crosstenant-Fromentityheader: Hosted X-Ms-Exchange-Crosstenant-ID: 686ea1d3-bc2b-4c6f-a92c-d99c5c301635 X-Ms-Exchange-Transport-Crosstenantheadersstamped: VI1PR0401MB2637 Sender: robomod@news.nic.it List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 68 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway X-Original-Cc: "linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" , "morbidrsa@gmail.com" , "oss@buserror.net" , Stuart Yoder , Doug Thompson , "mchehab@kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" X-Original-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 20:13:16 +0000 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <1470779760-16483-1-git-send-email-york.sun@nxp.com> <1470779760-16483-4-git-send-email-york.sun@nxp.com> <20160811133612.GA5801@nazgul.tnic> X-Original-Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Xref: csiph.com linux.kernel:1460880 On 08/11/2016 06:36 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 02:55:40PM -0700, York Sun wrote: >> The mpc85xx compatible DDR controllers are used on ARM-based SoCs. >> Separate the DDR part from mpc85xx EDAC driver and prepare to support >> both architecture. >> >> Signed-off-by: York Sun >> >> --- >> Change log >> v4: Change comment in file header >> Use lower case "fsl_ddr_edac" for EDAC_MOD_STR >> Drop exporting probe and remove symbols >> v3: Fix compiling errors and warnings caused by patch ordering >> v2: Reordered patch >> Separate FSL DDR commont code as shared object, not another driver >> This patch is generated with "git format-patch -M40 -C40" to show >> copy-and-delete. > > This patch doesn't apply this way: > > $ git apply --check -v < /tmp/03-driver-edac-fsl-ddr-separate_fsl_ddr_edac_driver_from_mpc85xx.patch > ... > > error: patch failed: drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c:724 > error: drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c: patch does not apply > Checking patch drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.h... > > $ patch -p1 --dry-run -F10 -i /tmp/03-driver-edac-fsl-ddr-separate_fsl_ddr_edac_driver_from_mpc85xx.patch > checking file drivers/edac/Makefile > checking file drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c (copied from drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c) > Hunk #3 FAILED at 132. > Hunk #4 succeeded at 1012 (offset -5 lines). > Hunk #5 succeeded at 1080 (offset -7 lines). > Hunk #6 FAILED at 1128. > Hunk #7 succeeded at 1145 (offset -8 lines). > Hunk #8 FAILED at 1173. > 3 out of 8 hunks FAILED > checking file drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.h (copied from drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.h) > checking file drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c > Hunk #3 FAILED at 627. > 1 out of 3 hunks FAILED > checking file drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.h > > $ git am -i /tmp/york.sun.03 > Applying: driver/edac/fsl-ddr: Separate FSL DDR EDAC driver from MPC85xx > error: patch failed: drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c:141 > error: drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c: patch does not apply > error: patch failed: drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c:724 > error: drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c: patch does not apply > Patch failed at 0001 driver/edac/fsl-ddr: Separate FSL DDR EDAC driver from MPC85xx > The copy of the patch that failed is found in: .git/rebase-apply/patch > When you have resolved this problem, run "git am -i --continue". > If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am -i --skip" instead. > To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am -i --abort". > > Please regenerate it against: > > http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/bp/bp.git#edac-for-4.9 > Boris, I checked your edac-for-4.9 branch. There are two minor changes when you apply the "Replace printk with proper pr_* format". I will send out a single "Patch v5 3/9". York