Path: csiph.com!news.freedyn.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Shamir Rabinovitch Newsgroups: linux.kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] device probe: add self triggered delayed work request Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 12:50:01 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Source-IP: aserv0022.oracle.com [141.146.126.234] Sender: robomod@news.nic.it List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 19 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway X-Original-Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Grant Likely , Santosh Shilimkar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shamir.rabinovitch@oracle.com X-Original-Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 13:42:51 +0300 X-Original-Message-ID: <20160808104250.GA12480@shamir-linux.uk.oracle.com> X-Original-Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Xref: csiph.com linux.kernel:1457699 Hi Qing, I suspect there is potential dead-lock with this patch: cpu0 cpu1 driver_deferred_probe_add deferred_probe_work_func ... mutex_unlock(&deferred_probe_mutex) mutex_lock(&deferred_probe_mutex) bus_probe_device(dev) ... device return -EPROBE_DEFER ... driver_deferred_probe_add ... mutex_lock(&deferred_probe_mutex) ... cancel_delayed_work(&deferred_probe_trigger_work) Please confirm if this scenario is possible. BR, Shamir Rabinovitch