Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Wadim Egorov Newsgroups: linux.kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] regulator: rk808: Migrate to regulator core's simplified DT parsing code Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 09:50:03 +0200 Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mimetrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on Idefix/Phytec(Release 9.0.1FP5 HF413|March 21, 2016) at 26.04.2016 09:45:56, Serialize by Router on Idefix/Phytec(Release 9.0.1FP5 HF413|March 21, 2016) at 26.04.2016 09:45:56, Serialize complete at 26.04.2016 09:45:56 X-Tnefevaluated: 1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Sender: robomod@news.nic.it List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 11 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway X-Original-Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org, mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@codeaurora.org, lee.jones@linaro.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com, a.zummo@towertech.it, alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com, dianders@chromium.org, zyw@rock-chips.com X-Original-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 09:45:56 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: <571F1CB4.10200@phytec.de> X-Original-References: <1461590448-47685-1-git-send-email-w.egorov@phytec.de> <1461590448-47685-5-git-send-email-w.egorov@phytec.de> <20160425173911.GQ3217@sirena.org.uk> X-Original-Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Xref: csiph.com linux.kernel:1387199 On 25.04.2016 19:39, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 03:20:44PM +0200, Wadim Egorov wrote: >> A common simplified DT parsing code for regulators was introduced in >> commit a0c7b164ad11 ("regulator: of: Provide simplified DT parsing >> method") > This doesn't apply against current code, please check and resend. Hm, for me all patches apply to the current code. This patch depends on the first rename patch. Maybe this is the problem?