Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Geert Uytterhoeven Newsgroups: linux.kernel Subject: Re: [RFC v2 23/24] m68k/mac: Fix PRAM accessors Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 09:00:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: Finn Thain Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=l6nc/uJtDEXcdLqCJ9izs2IL/O9XXZp2HH7a1zzhX1A=; b=TVbaM48zdxlzSwdO+XTgUXukhyACFc5E8Z5yi0KqPcFHvK9hl+dojXVakD6lFwOUCZ tRVw0k6JCyq1XK8efiSEFBzzRbs+P3laK0pG9pFGE1YJFqrxcYeRZIVzH8bbh17rAx+c J8Ryq8AlZPP9xuO78n1UjfrjonJlPs1Mj8ViAeatbxuJI0RSakcIa73Cu178jeUcILWe UAQily0smdZBi2JlPiuJW4Y3fzsPQXj00Ukijikbmb3juVuEFDbKfJmILQ8ngdqXaUfk rkmX34vBgzLymB0VZPuipKQAoY8K5vGhfrzAB5Wq0DmwvlZ7Bf+Dnmj+5miZdU1A3E+I +t9A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.90.133 with SMTP id o127mr7370672oib.79.1434610764185; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 23:59:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Sender-Auth: xiP7ZDyAaZ-SwE08NgKBJ0ddzKg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: robomod@news.nic.it List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 43 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway X-Original-Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Linux/m68k" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-api@vger.kernel.org" X-Original-Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 08:59:24 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <20150614074607.242676098@telegraphics.com.au> <20150614074613.054681242@telegraphics.com.au> X-Original-Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Xref: aioe.org linux.kernel:1167604 Hi Finn, On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 6:49 AM, Finn Thain wrote: > On Tue, 16 Jun 2015, in which I wrote: >> On Mon, 15 Jun 2015, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> > More magic values... >> >> [...] The only useful RTC documentation I've ever come across is this: >> http://mac.linux-m68k.org/devel/plushw.php > > This document appears to be Inside Macintosh vol. III ch. 2. It describes > the early RTC chip that lacks two-byte operations and XPRAM, and pre-dates > all Mac hardware supported in mainline Linux. But it does offer some > useful data, though not enough to answer all of your criticisms (as I > said). I understand. >> [...] I think they should be applied across the entire file, and in a >> different patch. Inconsistent use of such macros would be undesirable >> IMHO. > > So, unless you have other ideas, I will revise this patch and insert an > earlier patch to address existing code, and codify what little reliable > chip data we have. Thanks! Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/