Path: csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder7.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From: Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@panix.com>
Newsgroups: linux.debian.user
Subject: Re: taming lsblk command
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2019 16:30:01 +0100
Message-ID: <xenXP-3SA-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
References: <xenEu-3LN-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <xenOa-3Pg-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-user-request@lists.debian.org  Wed Jan  9 15:29:07 2019
Old-Return-Path: <jdashiel@panix.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.3 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate:hard: -5.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Mailing-List: <debian-user@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/744218
List-ID: <debian-user.lists.debian.org>
List-URL: <https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/>
List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/alpine.NEB.2.21.1901091028100.15959@panix1.panix.com
Approved: robomod@news.nic.it
Lines: 21
Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender: robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 10:28:53 -0500
X-Original-Message-ID: <alpine.NEB.2.21.1901091028100.15959@panix1.panix.com>
X-Original-References: <alpine.NEB.2.21.1901091002160.11594@panix1.panix.com> <20190109151750.ob4qqwhwi6fcsj64@well-adjusted.de>
Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.user:204246

It would if you had entered it backward.  Now I'm going to have to do a
typescript for you.
On Wed, 9 Jan 2019, Jochen Spieker wrote:

> Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 10:17:50
> From: Jochen Spieker <ml@well-adjusted.de>
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: taming lsblk command
>
> Jude DaShiell:
> > what works over here:
> > lsblk -n < /usr/bin/sort
>
> This command feeds the content of the file /usr/bin/sort into stdin of
> lsblk. That does not make sense and I guess lsblk is just ignoring this
> input.
>
> J.
>

--