Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder7.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From: rhkramer@gmail.com
Newsgroups: linux.debian.user,linux.kernel
Subject: Re: Can a recipients rights under GNU GPL be revoked? - Bradley M. Kuhn is not an attorney (he should go get his JD and get licensed).
Date: Sun, 05 May 2019 14:10:01 +0200
Message-ID: <xUo7T-jf-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
References: <xUo7T-jf-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Old-Return-Path: <rhkramer@gmail.com>
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0-5-amd64; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; )
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Approved: robomod@news.nic.it
Lines: 17
Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender: robomod@news.nic.it
Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.user:208202 linux.kernel:1743353

On Sunday, May 05, 2019 12:51:15 AM vsnsdualce2@redchan.it wrote:
> Bar rules do not allow lawyers to serve under a non-lawyer
> in
> an organization, and the organization was essentially a pro-bono law
> firm
> (which really needed a attorney in it's ranks...)

That's interesting, but (off the point of this email exchange), it puzzles me 
-- many corporations headed by non-lawyers have lawyers on staff, so I'm 
guessing that the statement you made applies only to organizations like law 
firms, or, the lawyers on the staff of a non-law corporation are in something at 
least a little different than the normal employer / employee relationship.

(PS: I stand corrected on Kuhn being a lawyer -- thanks for the correction.)

Now I have to debate (with myself) whether to prune the cc list -- I forget 
the original post -- was it really this widespread?