Path: csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.us.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.sovam.com!goblin1!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news.redatomik.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From: <tomas@tuxteam.de>
Newsgroups: linux.debian.user
Subject: Re: pointless systemd dependencies
Date: Mon, 07 May 2018 12:30:02 +0200
Message-ID: <vMLz4-8o7-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
References: <vMDLb-3fH-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <vMHvr-5QH-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <vMI89-66D-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <vMJdU-6P2-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <vMJQB-7jn-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-user-request@lists.debian.org  Mon May  7 10:21:20 2018
Old-Return-Path: <tomas@tuxteam.de>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.87 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FVGT_m_MULTI_ODD=0.02, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -6.1
Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=20171004; h=From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:To:Date; bh=SkH9E36lbiI4HkcB/eiZle+S4wXZ0v40HM0uvuIdh3s=; b=nBNFb45KORlg8E66O5InwdiYehLN+Z0In+07A7rne0qzCa453v0lMTTcDlqXCTLnM7s9u9kXSWkAiuY7zox8YRsbXSEFWOC45anqY9TXAULEvd79uXW3MqrOyMAJ+RpXQLBmv06ycnemWl/CS4yTRGa2KCqFObqCMYXfz2by8XSrGI++EemxLmvoUtjpirCXUCT3F5clBsjEE0K7woYi+VZnjdEUmfJgK0pIxOIX6qB17VEbd/ahU690XHexfrYsWw/FzwuAOGRBKdY6XxTj3AZbK5O5wOqO99jkz0hJGZtXNWzyL05nh2b3I6/YdQnegv7ZBUi1hqMVUJVcRrM5uQ==;
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; x-action=pgp-signed
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Mailing-List: <debian-user@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/735246
List-ID: <debian-user.lists.debian.org>
List-URL: <https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/>
List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20180507100503.GA15908@tuxteam.de
Approved: robomod@news.nic.it
Lines: 32
Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender: robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date: Mon, 7 May 2018 12:05:03 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID: <20180507100503.GA15908@tuxteam.de>
X-Original-References: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1805070140530.17760@hermes.661.org> <20180507054532.GB8533@tuxteam.de> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1805070604290.19303@hermes.661.org> <20180507074011.GH4569@bitfolk.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1805070814430.22593@hermes.661.org>
Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.user:195398

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 08:15:41AM +0000, David Griffith wrote:
> On Mon, 7 May 2018, Andy Smith wrote:
> 
> >Hi David,
> >
> >On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 06:32:16AM +0000, David Griffith wrote:
> >>How many packages are there that could possibly need to be linked against
> >>systemd?
> >
> >Are you going to provide us with any examples of packages you think
> >are needlessly linked against systemd? I expect there are some, but
> >depending on whether they are easy or hard to find would seem like
> >an easy first step in working out if this is a serious problem or
> >not.
> 
> tomas@tuxteam.de pointed out how to get a list of packages that link
> to libsystemd0.  I'll use that as a starting point.

Ah, now I understand. Looking forward :)

Cheers
- -- t
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlrwJM8ACgkQBcgs9XrR2kZVRgCeKWt8ZgEoIiwL9Ph+JpEqywQ2
UyEAn0NZFRKGaTMt+vHQJlru8RjRu5FE
=XkO0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----