Path: csiph.com!1.us.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Newsgroups: linux.debian.user Subject: svnadmin dump much slower in Bookworm Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 19:30:01 +0200 Message-ID: X-Original-To: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-user-request@lists.debian.org Thu Aug 10 17:21:13 2023 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-1 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_20=-1] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_FROM_MX=-3.1; rate: -4.6 Reply-To: Organization: Eclypse International Corporation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AdnLrLbxmw2cX+BbT9Owi9At4r4Ojw== Content-Language: en-us X-Sa-Exim-Connect-IP: 10.10.10.32 X-Sa-Exim-Mail-From: kjohnson@eclypse.org X-Sa-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 06 Jul 2022 17:58:28 +0000) X-Sa-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.eclypse.org) X-Old-From: "Ken Johnson" X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/802409 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/013101d9cbac$ba00d350$2e0279f0$@org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 12 Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:04:24 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <013101d9cbac$ba00d350$2e0279f0$@org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.user:260812 A set of svnadmin dump commands that run as part of a backup procedure = seem to be _much_ slower in Bookworm than in Bullseye. Prior to the = upgrade to Bullseye, these commands took slightly less than one hour. = After the upgrade, similar commands (dumping a few more revisions) = require more than six hours. The script that performs these commands = has not been changed. Has anyone else seen this problem? Thanks, Ken =20 =20