Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed7.news.xs4all.nl!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Charles Curley Newsgroups: linux.debian.user Subject: Re: authentication bug (or feature?) with multiple encrypted lvm2 volume groups Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 23:10:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: Debian Users X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-user-request@lists.debian.org Tue Feb 23 22:06:30 2021 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.853 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.347, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -3.5 X-Greylist: delayed 1464 seconds by postgrey-1.36 at bendel; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 22:06:08 UTC X-Authority-Reason: nr=8 Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=charlescurley.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Sender: Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=QInZVEBRA7oT3IEAvWAJpxQaOpT88PpSS+rL7WuGT20=; b=dKH+O4Az3GxkX6097VWGYk2apO Jv3qUIUyBHA0KGgNDO8Qm3/06lfO8uZ1JEFf7uB8O3Xvu0BQmvGkcWMk3LOb6bsrmPvtVGnFDUKDh 8dQ2V641xYRj8J/q2n+W8ptsX35V5K6aKNfh8dnZdo5H9/BNif+D7gB0PtCkg35GSZqC0liE2jKBC L4QZDecVHd1tPMtsZybaF/GG9eQKgD4kZnKkw82XvsB3xiLTq0sBkIE5snudhI4xs6bzRudq+crk2 vzXBj2qv7OSQPf69ArlwvtggkyuGPkKb7ifAY1HVv9Ni/NNuVLy8Rlo2rNIPTil3YjAvnDbg+tYII qHNfP3Tg==; Organization: occasionally X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Antiabuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-Antiabuse: Primary Hostname - box5635.bluehost.com X-Antiabuse: Original Domain - lists.debian.org X-Antiabuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-Antiabuse: Sender Address Domain - charlescurley.com X-Bwhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 72.36.20.38 X-Source-L: No X-Exim-ID: 1lEfR5-002vP1-SM X-Source-Sender: (hawk.localdomain) [72.36.20.38]:39108 X-Source-Auth: charlescurley@charlescurley.com X-Email-Count: 1 X-Source-Cap: Y2hhcmxpYTM7Y2hhcmxpYTM7Ym94NTYzNS5ibHVlaG9zdC5jb20= X-Local-Domain: yes X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/772477 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20210223144138.5baf1aae@hawk.localdomain Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 17 Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 14:41:38 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: <20210223144138.5baf1aae@hawk.localdomain> X-Original-References: <62d856e7-4d65-ee36-70ae-23c3ea06fa34@debianlists.mobilxpress.net> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.user:231997 On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 22:19:03 +0100 Marco M=C3=B6ller wrote: > Obviously, the in Step 2 entered (wrong) password (for "A") is stored=20 > and without further interactive consultation automatically used as > the input for the password authentication of "B". > Is this a bug or a feature? If it is a bug, where to report it? I think it is a feature. Had A and B had the same passphrase, the system would have asked for a passphrase for A, and then applied it to B as well; a nice convenience. --=20 Does anybody read signatures any more? https://charlescurley.com https://charlescurley.com/blog/