Path: csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!news.uzoreto.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Andreas Tille Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Any reason why python-scipy version 1.3.1 remains in experimental? Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2019 19:40:01 +0100 Message-ID: X-Original-To: Debian Python Modules Team , Debian Python X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sun Dec 1 18:36:51 2019 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-7 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -4.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/17679 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20191201183637.GB1945@an3as.eu Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 16 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2019 19:36:37 +0100 X-Original-Message-ID: <20191201183637.GB1945@an3as.eu> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:12083 Hi, according to the answer to an issue I opened agains scikit-bio[1] the test suite would work with scipy version 1.3.1. I wonder what might be the reason to stick to version 1.2.2 instaed of upgrading to the version in experimental. In case this situation would not change in the next weeks I'd consider to simply deactivate the said test. Kind regards Andreas. [1] https://github.com/biocore/scikit-bio/issues/1678 -- http://fam-tille.de