Path: csiph.com!tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Osamu Aoki Newsgroups: linux.debian.bugs.dist,linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Bug#936604: getmail: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 15:30:02 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org Wed Nov 13 14:27:19 2019 Old-Return-Path: X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.2 Reply-To: Osamu Aoki , 936604@bugs.debian.org Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org X-Debian-Pr-Message: followup 936604 X-Debian-Pr-Package: src:getmail X-Debian-Pr-Keywords: bullseye sid X-Debian-Pr-Source: getmail X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 18; hammy, 150; neutral, 89; spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--python3, 0.000-+--H*u:1.10.1, 0.000-+--H*UA:1.10.1, 0.000-+--H*u:2018-07-13, 0.000-+--H*UA:2018-07-13 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Debian-Message: from BTS X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1568902 List-ID: List-URL: Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 46 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: debian-python , Daniel Kahn Gillmor X-Original-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 23:22:58 +0900 X-Original-Message-ID: <20191113142258.GA3806@goofy.osamu.debian.net> X-Original-References: <20191112153727.GA8640@goofy.osamu.debian.net> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.bugs.dist:985230 linux.debian.maint.python:12068 Hi, On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 09:27:08AM +0100, Ondrej Novy wrote: > Hi, > > =FAt 12. 11. 2019 v=A016:37 odes=EDlatel Osamu Aoki na= psal: > > Upstream is active and prides to keep python 2.5 compatibility code in > it ... (Not just 2.7).=A0 I (Osamu Aoki ) and dkg e= ven > made some effort to support both 2 and 3 but the idea was rejected by > upstream in 2018. > > > that's odd :/ > > > I think this qualifies for "py2keep". > > > i don't think so. Imho is better to support Py3 in Debian with our patche= s. dkj: Do you? (Not me) > If Debian and Fedora demonstrate its python3 removal, I am sure the > upstream may change his thought.=A0 If you have some progress indicat= or, > that can be used to convince getmail upstream.=A0 I or dkg need a sol= id > fact to restart conversation with the upstream. > > > yes, we have! :) > > http://sandrotosi.me/debian/py2removal/py2removal_progress.png > > Almost half of work is done in ~ 3 months. This is interesting. I will inform upstream about this progress. But how much od current ~1800 packages fall into high popcon and build dependency category. Are these all high pop conpackages? Osamu