Path: csiph.com!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news.unit0.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Matthias Klose Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Python 2 removal in sid/bullseye: Progress and next steps Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 12:10:04 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Mon Nov 11 11:04:39 2019 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.04 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, REMOVEDOT=3, SARE_MLH_Stock10=1.66] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate:hard: -3.5 Old-X-Envelope-From: doko@debian.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/17572 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/6e7876eb-1336-d321-de1a-71ef3f23b770@debian.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 25 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 12:04:23 +0100 X-Original-Message-ID: <6e7876eb-1336-d321-de1a-71ef3f23b770@debian.org> X-Original-References: <1b2c86a04087a5afaa09dcd72c94e2683c339126.camel@ondrej.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:12000 On 11.11.19 11:43, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > On Mon, 2019-11-11 at 10:33 +0100, Ondřej Nový wrote: >> We are going to raise the severity of the py2removal bugs to "serious" >> in several steps. In the >> first phase we are going to raise severity of the py2removal bugs for >> all leaf module packages and low popcon (< 300) application packages. >> Bugs marked with the "py2keep" user tag will not have their severity >> raised. If nobody fixes that bug, the packages will be auto-removed >> from testing. >> We will also then file bug reports against ftp.debian.org to remove >> such packages from unstable. We are going to do this semi- >> automatically as additional packages become leaf packages. > > Hi, > > sorry if this has been discussed already somewhere else (I stopped reading > - -devel@ a long time ago) but is there something done to improve NEW processing > here? I have two package sitting there because of the introduction of a > - -python3 binary package. I don't think it's really make sense to remove > python2 stuff if python3 stuff can't enter the archive… well, at least you can name the packages in your email ...