Path: csiph.com!tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder7.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Ondrej Novy Newsgroups: linux.debian.bugs.dist,linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Bug#936604: getmail: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 09:40:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org Wed Nov 13 08:30:12 2019 Old-Return-Path: X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.749 Reply-To: Ondrej Novy , 936604@bugs.debian.org Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-Cc: Osamu Aoki X-Debian-Pr-Message: followup 936604 X-Debian-Pr-Package: src:getmail X-Debian-Pr-Keywords: bullseye sid X-Debian-Pr-Source: getmail X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 10; hammy, 142; neutral, 47; spammy, 1. spammytokens:0.950-+--our hammytokens:0.000-+--python3, 0.000-+--Python2, 0.000-+--py2removal, 0.000-+--py2keep, =?UTF-8?Q?0.000-+--Nov=C3=83=C2=BD?= Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ondrej-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=pLypHe8gNhb1qr73srtjbURvjcSIk6RRbuLr6GbZjyU=; b=Nzt5x6ZAUTyvnQd2gTCAcozobRWogg9Csib+v0C9ml9IFx+YlSHIRpfqwGSVEm0jJm ywZD3fhzj33EA5lfPWzH3UnD1b2TP4NLFFhju8vs1K6xrbkV67SoveQnCt4WPnwCI+S+ eW/uL+QEckUvre2gdfoaeVEODFqwPjbt0Ui/JbHNu+pJTNpB7WJArRRUhxBLsn+g3+3c KJk0YQG5wK6DNr+zF6T5N4O0kGdXscayoUqrIhBadcR7TwOsRAJaw+M4ljQbCoxBNyrV ra6MihgObxc9mWlXh3Fg2a+OaTcQl0dvPH8u8QVLUy4ehXGB44kNwYPch4rD31y7KR0A 6Nng== X-Google-Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=pLypHe8gNhb1qr73srtjbURvjcSIk6RRbuLr6GbZjyU=; b=AE6sIiDo/vz4hV2nFkdhwlizVmAWiyZOChz/ZqIFnU6ZeNTnzQHL3Peo7F2SsWwuAn ntAqQ3my8rjiYbB3zv+mjdHgho97tucIBDqb65ZR6UwHS3g8+aZ8pi9OZ7/K7oDUL8rI jlX4JLV3i+EyhDABNSoJI5CEg6x3I862709GN/dMF1DDV4SiNZYHZ4InQM9VGpHOP7Q/ MQ9UboZ18xflKT02fmrti8WNmC344CLlCIs7nVbQEY5Y1MRZ1YwqQlau983TAp7gGPPM +nNKbu3+P80dIFNHueLB0LJ//tCKMSVq/Svncp85tZAnqqJECr2fLkWxcmiL6+A7XyIk G7Kg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXXk4BRIcEiEgLO8yL3OFxNu5ueuonqlbdrUheFbUD8koMnbSGV DvjM/7IbwY5BWmoB+YLnIbo66qlKbjBdE8660bM= X-Google-SMTP-Source: APXvYqwtJvBNb7313E6FDxIEWxsNw3y+RoeW0M0obXLwjw/0leku1KmdghjNxETG9aA8yGklzRQ2g5ThRE88upFe+Wg= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:77da:: with SMTP id y26mr1019609uar.137.1573633639135; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 00:27:19 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000011402705973622de" X-Debian-Message: from BTS X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1568851 List-ID: List-URL: Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 77 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: 936604@bugs.debian.org, debian-python , Daniel Kahn Gillmor X-Original-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 09:27:08 +0100 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <20191112153727.GA8640@goofy.osamu.debian.net> <20191112153727.GA8640@goofy.osamu.debian.net> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.bugs.dist:985190 linux.debian.maint.python:12066 --00000000000011402705973622de Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, =C3=BAt 12. 11. 2019 v 16:37 odes=C3=ADlatel Osamu Aoki = napsal: > Upstream is active and prides to keep python 2.5 compatibility code in > it ... (Not just 2.7). I (Osamu Aoki ) and dkg even > made some effort to support both 2 and 3 but the idea was rejected by > upstream in 2018. that's odd :/ > I think this qualifies for "py2keep". > i don't think so. Imho is better to support Py3 in Debian with our patches. If Debian and Fedora demonstrate its python3 removal, I am sure the > upstream may change his thought. If you have some progress indicator, > that can be used to convince getmail upstream. I or dkg need a solid > fact to restart conversation with the upstream. > yes, we have! :) http://sandrotosi.me/debian/py2removal/py2removal_progress.png Almost half of work is done in ~ 3 months. --=20 Best regards Ond=C5=99ej Nov=C3=BD --00000000000011402705973622de Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,

=C3=BAt 12. 11. 2019 v=C2=A016:37 odes=C3=ADlatel = Osamu Aoki <osamu@debian.org>= napsal:
Upstrea= m is active and prides to keep python 2.5 compatibility code in
it ... (Not just 2.7).=C2=A0 I (Osamu Aoki <osamu@debian.org>) and dkg even
made some effort to support both 2 and 3 but the idea was rejected by
upstream in 2018.=C2=A0

that's odd :/
=C2=A0
I th= ink this qualifies for "py2keep".

=
i don't think so. Imho is better to support Py3 in Debian with our= patches.

If Debian and Fedora demonstrate its python3 removal, I am sure the upstream may change his thought.=C2=A0 If you have some progress indicator,=
that can be used to convince getmail upstream.=C2=A0 I or dkg need a solid<= br> fact to restart conversation with the upstream.

yes, we have! :)


Almost = half of work is done in ~ 3 months.

--
Best regards
=C2=A0Ond=C5=99ej = Nov=C3=BD

--00000000000011402705973622de--