Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Mattia Rizzolo Newsgroups: linux.debian.bugs.dist,linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Bug#936604: getmail: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 17:10:02 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: Osamu Aoki X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org Tue Nov 12 16:00:14 2019 Old-Return-Path: X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.2 Reply-To: Mattia Rizzolo , 936604@bugs.debian.org Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-Cc: Osamu Aoki X-Debian-Pr-Message: followup 936604 X-Debian-Pr-Package: src:getmail X-Debian-Pr-Keywords: bullseye sid X-Debian-Pr-Source: getmail X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 9; hammy, 150; neutral, 116; spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--H*ct:application, 0.000-+--H*ct:protocol, 0.000-+--H*ct:micalg, 0.000-+--H*ct:signed, 0.000-+--H*ct:pgp-signature MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uJWb33pM2TcUAXIl" Content-Disposition: inline X-Info: Keep It Simple, Stupid. X-Operating-System: Linux, kernel 5.2.0-2-amd64, inside Debian GNU/Linux bullseye/sid sid. X-Message-Flag: WARNING!! Outlook sucks. A lot. User-Agent: Every email client sucks, this one just sucks less. X-Debian-Message: from BTS X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1568751 List-ID: List-URL: Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 54 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: 936604@bugs.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org, Daniel Kahn Gillmor X-Original-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 16:57:17 +0100 X-Original-Message-ID: <20191112155717.GI785@mapreri.org> X-Original-References: <20191112153727.GA8640@goofy.osamu.debian.net> <20191112153727.GA8640@goofy.osamu.debian.net> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.bugs.dist:983225 linux.debian.maint.python:12007 --uJWb33pM2TcUAXIl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 12:37:27AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > Upstream is active and prides to keep python 2.5 compatibility code in > it ... (Not just 2.7). I (Osamu Aoki ) and dkg even > made some effort to support both 2 and 3 but the idea was rejected by > upstream in 2018. (Then we both lost motivation since upstream will not > include such code in near future) > https://marc.info/?l=3Dgetmail&m=3D151542515929707&w=3D2 >=20 > The upstream is somehow convinced that python2 will be there for some > time (Year ~2020 and later). > https://marc.info/?l=3Dgetmail&m=3D151542154628352&w=3D2 uh. meh. I haven't looked at the code, but if you made the effort, how improbable would it be for you to just keep the patches for py3 support yourself in the packaging for the time being? --=20 regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=3Dmattia `- --uJWb33pM2TcUAXIl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEi3hoeGwz5cZMTQpICBa54Yx2K60FAl3K1lsACgkQCBa54Yx2 K63LLg/+OtIhuwJwXgdfXDBTlb2LYoHvo2JuH2SYbTb7MlQVPf+dnFGyw86r+GXf kqO1MigeeacDOugE7fFQeRDx+v0FTENo6OGny8E7hPogtlm4SywnDIObtUVmUj8L u35TlrVHRGy6e2RcKbdcUss5ITPN1oeyjmDfLrzWX+q5DSaDuabXbWqxauBN84L0 zBkz2o8f4Sae1BIX583zIN57flD7/76FJX1yPTpGXWm9GwvixgzohvvXmhYRPWzH S/k/gpqVUOEuEUvunTBVyeYhp5cenrvJzWYglrbtPnwsGi2oPL7aUkaf6tEqZBLx heTRzG7F/AP/hbil+aKGfM4R436P+hG1VAA0PvUfAA0ocPHlD4HfGAAtrMONMpFN d3G0WRU0VxcbRKYbhUbgquZHgI7P5vwdHc2xMlmr2LxxNUaTtyEnHR6kjmf63MeH RjBh9gDDBDzsSVXbjHm8xzNHb23JeiWDJo6Mb1qUaXKdBA8o8ya/1OKAKl+BvBFO 0Hv4Cask1hFXY7e6v7Wq1PVlFIleCfwABKsIohIjb6tzjHygyHDzwKJw3HGcLAyw XSTOxPRshX88OgNyEGhNqSwdcg9ZnNxtITU6wItxb3cdYVk2hoPSgRBxF1aeBhG/ K3GN/fgY/c01tsOekYVSAdceNnTZeaR67YXc1BDj1BWVznwPyIA= =/AE/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uJWb33pM2TcUAXIl--