Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: "W. Martin Borgert" Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: dropping python2 [was Re: scientific python stack transitions] Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 22:50:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue Jul 9 20:46:30 2019 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -3.5 Old-X-Envelope-From: debacle@debian.org Old-X-Envelope-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Accept-Language: de, en, es User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/16958 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20190709204616.GA13006@fama Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 8 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 22:46:16 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: <20190709204616.GA13006@fama> X-Original-References: <8a411510-b646-1373-8a0f-363a8b1e3b56@zoho.com> <4937311.JbkhxS0vzt@l5580> <9a77db58-2549-f71e-9637-b46e802f55cc@debian.org> <20190708080006.x23pd6rwdhkeybz5@manillaroad.local.home.trueelena.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:11468 On 2019-07-08 10:00, Elena ``of Valhalla'' wrote: > I don't think it would be accepted by backports, since it goes against > the requirement that stuff in backports is in testing (and meant to > remain there when it becomes stable). I'm not sure, but building an additional binary package from the same source package might be OK for bpo. Of course, d/control etc. would differ, but that's common.