Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder7.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Matthias Klose Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Bug#943666: python3: Update Python Policy for removal of the Python 2 stack Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2019 23:50:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Wed Nov 6 22:49:43 2019 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.68 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, GMAIL=1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -3.5 Old-X-Envelope-From: doko@debian.org Old-X-Envelope-To: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/17551 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/c9d916d8-e85b-d910-2cdc-0a1aa1a99254@debian.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 33 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 23:49:29 +0100 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <157219557159.26091.1776693685861918595.reportbug@sylvester.codehelp> <20191103133939.5143cc2e@sylvester.codehelp> <20191103140909.5c28050b@sylvester.codehelp> <19d35685-6405-772c-c292-5a1149463a30@debian.org> <87wocc68ew.fsf@silverfish.pri> <87ftj0af8i.fsf@DigitalMercury.dynalias.net> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:11983 On 06.11.19 22:04, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > Brian May writes: > >> Stéphane Blondon writes: >> >>> Perhaps there is a doubt how to read it? >>> - do not (remove python-foo-doc or rename it to python3-foo-doc) >>> - (do not remove python-foo-doc) or (rename it to python3-foo-doc) >>> >>> Would it be better if we remove the indentation and use this sentence(?): >>> if documentation is in python-foo-doc, do not move it >> >> Myself, I read it as the first option. >> >> I would personally use: >> >> - Do not remove python-foo-doc and do not rename it to python3-foo-doc. >> >> Or maybe even expand as two bullet points: >> >> - Do not remove python-foo-doc. >> - Do not rename it to python3-foo-doc. >> >> I think this makes it very explicit what was intended. > > +1. I also read it as (do (not (remove python-foo-doc) or (not (rename > to python3-foo-doc)))). In natural language that "or" should be a > "nor", but breaking it into two negated bullet points may be clearer to > those whose first language doesn't possess a negative list operator. please could one of you open an issue with a patch to track the change? Thanks, Matthias