Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Craig Small Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Raising severity to serious for some Python 2 leaf packages with no Python 3 support upstream Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 23:30:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: Nicholas D Steeves X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Mon Oct 14 21:24:09 2019 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.501 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD=0.499, HTML_MESSAGE=2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .dropbear. - helo: .mail-qk1-x730.google. - helo-domain: .google.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2; rate: -5.5 Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dropbear-xyz.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=i24goXYKMICcjNAQjapKDbVTrsaR8Nn/aNdoMrrVeYM=; b=z306XMmZkYbVOgj7MFNhpSQr4FxEH/Zbp+CDmYcGMFr1iuvpGPULuVLqRTJkfGsCh2 HxUNYbC0Zix43y+K72cFwwG4elLoHtBKdzhGFhz+jeT68HaDUv7D7U9ySJfeZRoZUFRS heKg1BTX6DLsE6uWJt2jOJbh3NiKmGPqqoT6dds3AFVzlS3skvmBsxLXJNWbiaCUW/TM 9puf49s+2Dgbf/+nCVP5FF6IXwXRXjIx+gXWcAutUYzv5r/h1BYW2Hgt1p3Mvcpf3Hw0 VXIaVOaEqRQvlHV8zzCa02VLiO9n04axZQyPBxbUZ7VTHOyaDqjWjCYNcCLMWnGTUMQ3 iclQ== X-Google-Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=i24goXYKMICcjNAQjapKDbVTrsaR8Nn/aNdoMrrVeYM=; b=eBuxBO+6maBuw1StpHipR11ZK+fbD0db/BHkO5kNj1Ns0QPt2aP79xHwAYaWOWMJ03 6NM3G1wzbKFCm8b8KJyEPUgLs2rCAVz8w9qpuaMMQyqYIn3PyNn+lUeBmPSOyE6tr10f L4CS0hygKX2dPQZVNmrt8O73jF7lULgNeREgb4FVsUFVe9nb6RHnPfs2TCwiM0tO4TI0 MWePt6p7BJcQfJYoHChk3XaBTziCcIGdx1BogBbUxMRCMNwDo6ubB/oHWd+d95JRV+jN o70dXwVEzijusbGrVIvWSlCYmGYwDxfl6cUqvZZRlXDXjsBLG7T3T0t77sx7S2i6jM7v NZ1w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXyNzQEAVBe0njX/kuRIu0cq/YZUSIoII41m8t4fu30e5XL+eM1 +SGb0qUWrKFeUhggybR4TQwuZeQOv7DFNqlqtB+xUvCudH0= X-Google-SMTP-Source: APXvYqwHhP82ke7kBo7jX74TwvsTKbLCWWM1fFs5bopHFeEfOn52c0jnozzdrLtteXFojXr7QZ3wJGwvOtATb5T/LWo= X-Received: by 2002:a37:9c0a:: with SMTP id f10mr18289259qke.321.1571087157050; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 14:05:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e85a050594e53b6e" X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/17446 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/CALy8Cw7TEvK=cuRVriAxz2nnYa7LYQJgvNa=XqnvVh1rkLJbBg@mail.gmail.com Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 37 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: debian-python X-Original-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 08:05:44 +1100 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <90426bab-9b7e-468c-da1b-6815bd6e947f@debian.org> <87zhi4gfil.fsf@DigitalMercury.dynalias.net> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:11897 --000000000000e85a050594e53b6e Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi All, Just be careful with the bugs severity on complicated packages. I totally get the python only packages that produce a single binary, go for it for those. However consider the net-snmp python module. It's python 2 only and upstream isn't changing it. In fact I am pretty sure they don't support it. So get rid of it right? Yes, except that I cannot get a new version of net-snmp into the archive due to a perl module bug. So while I agree on the general approach, just look out for those multiple binary type packages. - Craig --000000000000e85a050594e53b6e Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi All,
=C2=A0 Just be careful with the = bugs severity on complicated packages. I totally get the python only packag= es that produce a single binary, go for it for those.

However consider the net-snmp python module. = It's python 2 only and upstream isn't changing it. In fact I am pre= tty sure they don't support it.

So get rid=C2=A0of it right? Yes, except that I cannot get a ne= w version of net-snmp into the archive due to a perl module bug.

So while I agree on the general ap= proach, just look out for those multiple binary type packages.

=C2=A0- Craig

--000000000000e85a050594e53b6e--