Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Nicholas D Steeves Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Raising severity to serious for some Python 2 leaf packages with no Python 3 support upstream Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 05:50:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Mon Oct 14 03:41:59 2019 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.099 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FOURLA=0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MEDS2=2, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -5.5 Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=UHKG6f/soJlusGW/usIUhwxcmzxDRQd8pnBFqyQskPc=; b=Lj4q4XRkZkyy5LT5BTItDTAMxBnVQj/Ey5yWrBM9scJAT06UlZPKWB9F3Uij5WXplr dHdItZIXEvl7TrSAMvR+YxUJfhYmDxvFi4AdbgfEEqd6n5E2HF6TkMh6dehB+XcYRqxz 7Sb/3Kk2K9B1Jf4DiJzfYGJ62IRQVVs2KMrM0T2a9eG+0JdxzUuxS0Mkv/zxcHj5NJS3 P/zkoOlh+802uH8AcGy7OpbZ5oEyuKNhiWxd8NzRn6VUeAv1+wuYSGtGjEnTpqdsCrLY 9Znwx7K5vjbpme7IzM2WlAjv0/mF9aGZKpCRF2hQcNlTB3/Xwr5Z9vAEL0QTHBNKok5b p2Sw== X-Google-Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=UHKG6f/soJlusGW/usIUhwxcmzxDRQd8pnBFqyQskPc=; b=aCSs4fVG/CvU75RrD/xY1qq8CC68p7I+hZMwHezIWcBD915DpwDtj5lMPHi3KeMYgs /6qNdf1VFec2qKp3rFat44aXtlfstIuln/4gt1ag7DjCvliwIad/rE60YaKUm562phYD 3pbI/WuvXkgKniM5v2hjR2I+VKD2u5tdycDtNWjKulT4/Tc3Z/RjfjhwIrcInE+rlfRk ov7ERvuj8cMvBXhyb4ulJkp0vOp32SbaJLln6+XOdIpXtD1b4AxxJCdXDVST6976SNFd llckTBJAXIjSNK8vAn7Ni/JkRpA/jX+u8gHWtWw/rN/VzRfjoX3lT4e4yjpcU0Rd7QjR 1vfA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWddexTUpGMunSXT7zYzP43qeO3iWvQEPke30PjvgZfB4ARf0DK phZwPovwe8y6GrgVc05RCh/tIBcm X-Google-SMTP-Source: APXvYqwbJOxi7lPSAvv8+lMm2XlNoSk/lltYBCgQ4GoYF/Uha9wCAD2cWIfZ4yuIm8j36Wn1Me141Q== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:6683:: with SMTP id d3mr29655253qtp.85.1571024503404; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 20:41:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/17431 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/87zhi4gfil.fsf@DigitalMercury.dynalias.net Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 70 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 23:41:38 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <87zhi4gfil.fsf@DigitalMercury.dynalias.net> X-Original-References: <90426bab-9b7e-468c-da1b-6815bd6e947f@debian.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:11883 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Hi Thomas and Python Team, Thomas Goirand writes: > For example, today I looked into removing Python 2 from python-cogent. > Running sixer on all files lead to a huge log of problems to solve by > hand. There's no upstream support for Python 3 on that one. > > For this kind of package, I see no way out except: > - Upstream works on Python 3 support > - Someone in Debian makes the effort > > But in both cases, it's going to take a very long time. Do we really > want to get stuck on these packages for like forever, or would it feel > ok to raise the severity to serious, so that the package gets > auto-removed and then we can work on removing Python 2 from its > dependencies? It seems to me that a fair and conservative solution is to send an announcement once a month that all Python 2 packages will have an RC bug filed against them on 1 January 2020. I work on the Calibre package, and depend on it for my daily work. I do not believe that its reverse deps should be removed before 1 Jan 2020. As far as the maximum number of announcements, how about: the first announcement ASAP, the second one 1 Nov, then 1 Dec. Lets CC this announcement to devel, -python, -med, and any other teams with a significant number of Python packages. The issue is similar to global warming. People will hide their head in the sand singing "nah nah nah, it's not real, I don't have to deal with it" until a tipping point occurs. Honestly part of me wonders if RedHat/IBM is going to maintain Python 2, like they did with Java. https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2018/09/24/the-future-of-java-and-openjdk-updates-without-oracle-support Barring that hypothetical possibility, I still think the right thing to do is file RC bugs the 1 of January. What happens then? My guess is upstreams start containerising their py2 software and someone will write a helper script like py2-zombie-flatpack. Cheers, Nicholas --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEE4qYmHjkArtfNxmcIWogwR199EGEFAl2j7nIACgkQWogwR199 EGGbpRAA2KUYc7KKgktyfLAJ3QzkxTMTI8ChN7DlSpWw/SAajdka2aM7Uml6VxsG 44QcGgyRDD8gInlpeNRzxHB6DQIjrPcTSHRUTjUMVr6LII00fJKKCoEHcg5u80py d6fvnG+LJqJUNo2sjYWVTwzKPwYeKqJDc8WqKR8ZYWFMo1XAUW721Z2FTrf8Oeui WJoZvsdIeRFmvvILDVWrMwl3W1/uxCPTSQjMwh2TBBY0552OGPkL/1ZHuqX/apqp t3Qw24+enu308GLZsGChOph5k3kJ6sfcFqgY2hK94etKW8IxKlq4z4hE+TsqMxDE ONNAd/30SOR+axmgVL9vkJFgw1f0dGfG51OZWyoNW/1on9N08WqUG1lSPT6EvXR5 nSmO70uSRKMcCeQPqeY0OgppT9IKxQbfw72KLZiYcfccU03I8SJo6qsSv97PY1xW CyzJX4GTlxT1eelYVafHq1S6v7BtKQxjJAAHKlvbEsbpbeX5lLiCn8vnn8Kk0vBt x2tjXZCEt8aVL2rznqEZvA9Kt7FCJfxAPolVJQqBg0idw7+QiZ72Xt7kj6ggRjCa /o5okCf2+f/bqqBtrDgtdt8/dBYT64WsYhCARqqrUyNkRWHj39wpUhAsnFX5JIzN KhOyyuKgYu0fBsWSdhfQWdRRcbsPtWJWQCzML+kw/Ga6AJYR+Tk= =TibC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--