Path: csiph.com!4.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder7.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Drew Parsons Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python,linux.debian.devel.release Subject: Re: python-scipy: autopkgtest fails (Re: bug#919929) Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2019 15:30:02 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Thu Mar 7 14:24:18 2019 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.98 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .debian. - helo: .relay8-d.mail.gandi. - helo-domain: .gandi.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_NOT_HELO(DOMAIN)=0; rate: -3.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: The Debian Project Reply-To: dparsons@debian.org Mail-Reply-To: dparsons@debian.org X-Sender: dparsons@debian.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.8 X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/16816 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/ab07bc077c46dbf4f42d6f725bfd7f83@debian.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 22 Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: Andreas Tille , debian-python@lists.debian.org, jtaylor.debian@googlemail.com, debian-release@lists.debian.org X-Original-Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2019 22:24:00 +0800 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <3e555bf95e5228d291a7fe94beaa4ada@emerall.com> <20190307080302.zc6q5ljr6vyd2yqf@an3as.eu> <61c0d630-7a1a-aa31-d6c6-062b3747b735@debian.org> <387d0b8f-0cf2-2edf-62fe-8ee63c86dcd3@debian.org> <2c31128b7f9ea0a3d1b1f44327872959@debian.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:11356 linux.debian.devel.release:84899 On 2019-03-07 22:07, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Drew, > > On 07-03-2019 14:56, Drew Parsons wrote: >> On 2019-03-07 20:46, Paul Gevers wrote: >>> However, it is probably worth waiting for a resolution of bug >>> 915738 and combine it with that. >> >> There hasn't been recent movement on 915738. I'll apply Julian's patch >> and see how we go. > > Huh. There was a comment from doko that the underlying issue is fixed > in > gcc-8, no? I think you only need to switch to the default gfortran. On > the other hand, I don't know how feasible it is at this moment to not > release buster with gcc-7. Maybe other release team members can comment > on that? Perhaps it's ok now, as Matthias says. Testing on zelenka now. I'll do the 919929 upload if s390x proves fine. Drew