Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Drew Parsons Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: scipy 1.2.0 and joining DPMT Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 05:10:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Wed Jan 30 04:06:23 2019 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, WEBMAIL=1] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -3.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Organization: The Debian Project Reply-To: dparsons@debian.org Mail-Reply-To: dparsons@debian.org X-Sender: dparsons@debian.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.1.2 X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/16752 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/c594a49337626de9d9dadf8a8aa6c5df@emerall.com Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 21 Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: Ondrej Novy , debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Original-Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 05:06:08 +0100 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <71a3-5c4ed600-b-67211a00@122644498> <20190129093620.GA4728@mitya57.me> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:11297 On 2019-01-29 10:36, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 11:13:46AM +0100, webmail@emerall.com wrote: >> Thanks Ondrej, read and accepted.   >> The policy on Maintainer/Upload fields is interesting. >> I've installed git-dpm, likely it will be useful for my other >> packages. > > It will not be useful in DPMT/PAPT. The policy is outdated and we have > switched to using gbp instead, as described here: > > https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackaging Ah good, thanks for the update Dmitry. By the way I apologise for my webmail client showing my email plumbing (it should have replied as dparsons@debian.org not webmail@emerall.com). My email provider (gandi.net) recently changed its webmail interface, but the new software doesn't handle Reply-To addresses well. I've sent them a bug report. Drew