Path: csiph.com!news.redatomik.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Mattia Rizzolo Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: [RFC] Dropping Python2 support for my package Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2019 18:40:02 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sat Jan 12 17:35:25 2019 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.9 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate:hard: -3.5 Mail-Followup-To: debian-python@lists.debian.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="df+09Je9rNq3P+GE" Content-Disposition: inline X-Info: Keep It Simple, Stupid. X-Operating-System: Linux, kernel 4.19.0-1-amd64, inside Debian GNU/Linux buster/sid sid. X-Message-Flag: WARNING!! Outlook sucks. A lot. User-Agent: Every email client sucks, this one just sucks less. X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/16690 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20190112173505.GE18841@mapreri.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 57 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2019 18:35:06 +0100 X-Original-Message-ID: <20190112173505.GE18841@mapreri.org> X-Original-References: <20190112153255.GD18841@mapreri.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:11238 --df+09Je9rNq3P+GE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 04:39:44PM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote: > > just drop the python-debianbts binary, without doing any kind of > > strange migration, and keep the name python-debianbts for the > > python3 package, as the Debian Python Policy states. >=20 > I think there's an error in your advice and I can't figure out what > you mean. You're suggesting to drop *and* to keep the python-debianbts > package :) Can you please clarify? Yes, I made an error there indeed (that I think Andrey corrected already). But let my try again: just drop the python-debianbts binary, without doing any kind of strange migration, and keep the name python3-debianbts for the python3 package, as the Debian Python Policy states. As Andrey wrote, don't touch the source package name either. Sorry if I spread confusion accidentally=E2=80=A6 --=20 regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=3Dmattia `- --df+09Je9rNq3P+GE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEi3hoeGwz5cZMTQpICBa54Yx2K60FAlw6JUcACgkQCBa54Yx2 K61xew//XIf/Ynlefy7fX0kDieb1l8/alC/IuUVcyJ9LpGPJ9HXyhaiReLG/+dA1 grDaF5pd1jBe6BuyA9634dOb7DOdHIC2XSDdCe2+eRb+dlPczJ5BKuJt1Y30gTvc w3J0ZRwH2MF2PaTGvJVo+/Lv0hcY/P1YJhTLE27RTpCG6l/R2pt757o3QRFzf+ck 0GcOK/3lV3U5Fhv30Ae+GRRsaKbr7IFggrlMGm5Eu8EthN/z5w3lXfreiocmw2Od qvuULWQNjccDmv7e4mMe1+SimEwBu6s4nKSAQfWzWh4GRfrEykVVCWbrxHjUseyU VmBFb/ZjkwPwxO0yomn4SCqWqVZ/gwhaNoWUQ7DE/EGfYkATkLc7Vf4HtBfq3oB8 902m1lbJByhNf2D4nMJVGhKaXtia+OOkDIsVIesdj31yqA+luYleMiyU3sATBQoM wXJPej2L1DmICqZsKeB+/jLOnKGL4eVGefRv0GKRQSxRpUqUeheMvYW+jB9mbn8E IQLPR+qCpZQ5mz+UA5VI7CR3eggikQ2efYhwKuj0vOFpN10sme2Izf/6E1qdRfpu Bcf8opkFtWXN3bmWj+/uBepHk1Px+RNEgDy9viatzjXy4rkatPPhxmpicc1mCWVf rA6WELm3gVY9rkte2cZLjshJqF72UTNjib3vHzJyKaEMnP9GFYs= =LfOD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --df+09Je9rNq3P+GE--