Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!news.unit0.net!newsfeed.CARNet.hr!news.spin.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Geert Stappers Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: reference package python3 PAPT Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2018 23:30:02 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue Dec 25 22:29:14 2018 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/16625 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20181225222901.wwivrshvayocdfon@gpm.stappers.nl Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 27 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2018 23:29:01 +0100 X-Original-Message-ID: <20181225222901.wwivrshvayocdfon@gpm.stappers.nl> X-Original-References: <20181223162207.i37m4aibmqm44kdg@gpm.stappers.nl> <3216742.zGnAFTocEb@kitterma-e6430> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:11175 On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 05:52:22PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Sunday, December 23, 2018 05:22:07 PM Geert Stappers wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Which PAPT package is a fairly good shape to be used as reference > > for bringing another PAPT package in better shape? > > > > > > Context: > > I'm new to PAPT and would like to have some examples packages. > > I think pymilter-milters is in pretty good shape (as of the version I just > uploaded), keeping in mind it's still python2 and if your upstream supports > it, you should try to go python3. Thank you, it got me started. And I have updated the subject line with the intention that more possible reference packages are being reported. Groeten Geert Stappers Who cautiously begins to understand that there is nothing really special about packaging Python applications. But still in doubt. -- Leven en laten leven