Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.unit0.net!newsfeed.CARNet.hr!news.spin.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From: "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org>
Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python
Subject: Re: git-dpm -> gbp conversion (mass-change)
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2018 10:30:01 +0200
Message-ID: <wiDDb-1AH-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
References: <winI5-sq-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <wiyWS-793-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <wizpT-7iu-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <wiA2B-7MT-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <wiBL4-pA-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <wiCnL-SF-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <wiDtv-1xg-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org  Fri Aug  3 08:23:48 2018
Old-Return-Path: <debacle@debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate:hard: -5
Old-X-Envelope-From: debacle@debian.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Accept-Language: de, en, es
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
X-Mailing-List: <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/16172
List-ID: <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL: <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20180803082248.GA10400@fama
Approved: robomod@news.nic.it
Lines: 12
Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender: robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Original-Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2018 10:22:48 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID: <20180803082248.GA10400@fama>
X-Original-References: <20180802151614.jlu5w3l3lnhwi3he@werner.olasd.eu> <CAOO6c=xY4V+-sLo6u72O+VXz6dAVR2ALe60U-=nx6uMfSNjTKA@mail.gmail.com> <20180803035100.GA9931@fama> <0BA88625-8549-4029-AF86-896BA9947BCD@kitterman.com> <20180803062128.GB1955@fama> <20180803070413.GA11122@espresso.pseudorandom.co.uk> <20180803080859.GA9380@fama>
Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:10752

On 2018-08-03 10:08, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> On 2018-08-03 08:04, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > There is no upstream/master, upstream/unstable, upstream/stretch or
> > similar in DEP-14, because:
> 
> I did not suggest mingling upstream branches with Debian
> versions, which seems to be your impression. I just (maybe
> wrongly) thought, that upstream/master whatever upstream does in
                                        ^ follows
> their master/tip/trunk (just as upstream/latest always follows
> the latest upstream release). I don't remember, where I got that
> idea from. Unreliable sources :~)