Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Andreas Tille Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: -dbg vs -dbgsym compressed files when using Python3 Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 19:40:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Wed Oct 24 17:39:26 2018 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-7 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/16483 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20181024173903.z6vcitnq7enzjfhv@an3as.eu Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 21 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 19:39:03 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: <20181024173903.z6vcitnq7enzjfhv@an3as.eu> X-Original-References: <20181023180515.cfey3q4njptzi76g@an3as.eu> <20181023222236.3wq53om3oc5akrzr@sar0.p1otr.com> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:11049 Hi Piotr, On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 12:22:36AM +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > > Since I polished python-lzma I uploaded the package anyway with new > > Vcs fiels and other polishing stuff. > > please don't remove -dbg packages, -dbgsym packages are useless for us, AFAICT > (python{,3}-foo-dbg packages contain modules for Python debug > interpreter, something that -dbgsym packages do not provide) OK, noted for the future. Do you think I should re-add it to python-lzma? I'd bet that this long unattended Python2 package will most probably not cause any real wish for debugging - for sure I might be wrong. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de