Path: csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.CARNet.hr!news.spin.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Simon McVittie Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Upstreams dropping Python 2 support Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 15:20:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Thu Sep 27 13:19:47 2018 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-7 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/16375 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20180927131925.GB12138@espresso.pseudorandom.co.uk Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 11 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 14:19:25 +0100 X-Original-Message-ID: <20180927131925.GB12138@espresso.pseudorandom.co.uk> X-Original-References: <20180802151614.jlu5w3l3lnhwi3he@werner.olasd.eu> <20180927095508.GA19722@mitya57.me> <87o9cjntx7.fsf@debian.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:10945 On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 at 11:58:28 +0200, Ole Streicher wrote: > Is there a reason why one would use Python2-sphinx instead of the Python > 3 version? src:dbus-python has more Python 2 API than Python 3 API (some objects cease to exist in Python 3 builds). As long as python-dbus.deb exists, it's somewhat valuable for the Python-version-independent documentation in python-dbus-doc.deb to have been built with the Python 2 version of sphinx. smcv