Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Raphael Hertzog Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: New upstream version of python-xlwt Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 10:30:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: Thomas Goirand X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Wed Mar 28 08:24:35 2018 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.741 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Mail-Followup-To: Raphael Hertzog , Thomas Goirand , debian-python@lists.debian.org, Andreas Noteng , kretcheu@gmail.com, debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org, umlaeute@debian.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/15747 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20180328082417.GA5721@home.ouaza.com Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 33 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org, Andreas Noteng , kretcheu@gmail.com, debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org, umlaeute@debian.org X-Original-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 10:24:17 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: <20180328082417.GA5721@home.ouaza.com> X-Original-References: <20171026102724.xs26wecyhhk4igsd@mail.dittberner.home> <449a9000-ff92-bbb6-5523-457d258156b6@debian.org> <63f517e4-b338-f751-0dc4-7cda70433e49@debian.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:10348 Hi, ccing maintainers of reverse dependencies of python-xlwt. We switched to a new upstream version (0.7.5 -> 1.3.0) so you might want to check that your packages are still working with this new version (rows, python-pandas, On Thu, 26 Oct 2017, Thomas Goirand wrote: > I've found out that antlr.py is embedded, and still in use in this > upstream release. So I added a patch to remove it from upstream. This change was not good. The embedded antlr.py is patched for xlwt. See https://github.com/python-excel/xlwt/issues/73 This change thus got reverted and I uploaded the resulting package with a few more cleanups. > However, the package was using git-dpm. As always, importing a new > release with git-dpm is a nightmare. Therefore, before doing it, I > simply removed all patches (as I thought no patch was needed). Now, > what's the way to make it again so that the package uses git-dpm? Is it > still needed these days, or is it ok to not do it in the team? AFAIK it's OK to not use git-dpm. However it seems that the team documentation would need an update... also since we haven't documented the switch to salsa either. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Support Debian LTS: https://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html Learn to master Debian: https://debian-handbook.info/get/