Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Thomas Goirand Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Where to put docs of a -doc package for python 2 + 3 modules? Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 09:20:02 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: debian-python X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue Mar 13 08:18:29 2018 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-7 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -5 Organization: Debian User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/15635 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/b294c451-c7c0-0ddc-cd30-90ee63791ad7@debian.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 15 Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 09:18:09 +0100 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <20180312101616.GA21465@fama> <20180312223017.GD10894@fama> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:10240 On 03/13/2018 12:29 AM, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > Imo, we should just make it clear in policy that source packages > should be named `foo` or `python-foo`, > and corresponding doc packages should be named `foo-doc` or `python-foo-doc`. Very often, "foo" is already taken by another package, and we have to fallback to python-foo. Think about generic libs for compression, images, network standards... Which is why I think we should have standardize on python-foo for the source package (which is what I do). Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)