Path: csiph.com!news.bbs.geek.nz!news.albasani.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: "W. Martin Borgert" Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Merge modules and apps team? Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 10:40:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Wed Feb 7 09:37:01 2018 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate:hard: -4.2 Old-X-Envelope-From: debacle@debian.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Accept-Language: de, en, es User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.3 (2018-01-21) X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/15507 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20180207093540.GA19718@fama Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 9 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Original-Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 10:35:40 +0100 X-Original-Message-ID: <20180207093540.GA19718@fama> X-Original-References: <20180207073745.GA18829@fama> <579b018a-647b-bdef-f8fa-0d3bd530a477@debian.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:10113 On 2018-02-07 09:58, Matthias Klose wrote: > I don't think that is a good idea. Both teams are not very active when it comes > to address RC issues and updating to new upstream versions. From my point of > view the apps team is worse than the modules team in this regard. In fact, this is one of the reasons I like to merge them. I hope, that the slightly better situation of the modules will rub off on the apps. My illusions might be in vain, but at least I do not see any disadvantage in the merge.