Path: csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.datemas.de!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Thomas Goirand Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Updated PEP 394 (python and python2 commands) Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 09:10:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue May 22 07:09:02 2018 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-7 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -5 Organization: Debian User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/15979 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/0eb5cd5e-fda5-6509-ebb4-de12ddd4e9a8@debian.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 18 Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 09:08:43 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: <0eb5cd5e-fda5-6509-ebb4-de12ddd4e9a8@debian.org> X-Original-References: <6dc7af52-174f-04c5-9149-cc5affa8afb1@debian.org> <6a23522f-060f-7624-f950-63c8f641bd3f@debian.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:10573 On 05/21/2018 01:38 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > You probably didn't notice that this is already happening (mentioned in= the thread). Great! > There are other parts of the proposal that we are less sanguine about t= hat you conveniently removed. It is probably a better idea to get your f= acts straight before you start throwing around accusations. I haven't "start throwing around accusations", I wrote that "[I] don't understand why". Indeed, I found this thread confusing about what Matthias proposed, and what you and Piotr didn't want. And I'm sure that I'm not the only one confused. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)