Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Brian May Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Questions about salsa and Git Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 01:40:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Thu Apr 12 23:36:32 2018 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -4.2 Organization: Debian MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/15816 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/87woxc9evo.fsf@silverfish.pri Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 23 Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 09:36:11 +1000 X-Original-Message-ID: <87woxc9evo.fsf@silverfish.pri> X-Original-References: <20180410111127.GA19894@espresso.pseudorandom.co.uk> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:10416 Simon McVittie writes: > Is this now official policy for new/updated/converted Python modules > maintained by DPMT? > > Is it official policy for new/updated/converted Python applications > maintained by PAPT? I am not exactly an authoritive figure, but I believe the answer to both of these is yes. It is possible that there are a number of packages that still need to be converted. I had a script on aloth to do this, it might need updating for salsa. Especially as it relied on direct access to the git directory to change the default branch. > At the moment each of those pages says that the Python teams have chosen > the relevant packaging system and that the other packaging system is > forbidden, which is confusing at best. Both pages do need updating. -- Brian May