Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From: Adam Hupp <adam@hupp.org>
Newsgroups: linux.debian.bugs.dist,linux.debian.maint.python
Subject: Bug#877849: [tryton-debian] Namespace conflict for python-magic
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 07:50:02 +0100
Message-ID: <v86KJ-69T-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
References: <um3vQ-8os-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <umjTZ-1V1-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <umoTD-55T-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <umDSG-7ph-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <uwA78-4eO-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <uxbq1-1rf-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <uFcff-3CO-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <uxusF-65m-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <uT5dT-VH-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <v5Daa-4Gb-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <v5Ezg-5F7-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <uxusF-65m-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <v5Ezg-5F7-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Old-Return-Path: <debbugs@buxtehude.debian.org>
Reply-To: Adam Hupp <adam@hupp.org>, 877849@bugs.debian.org
Original-Sender: adam.hupp@gmail.com
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-Cc: wnpp@debian.org, Christoph Biedl <debian.axhn@manchmal.in-ulm.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: robomod@news.nic.it
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Approved: robomod@news.nic.it
Lines: 35
Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway
Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.bugs.dist:875349 linux.debian.maint.python:10049

Whew, I was worried for a moment :)  I've pushed an update to the
branch (note: will require a force pull if you already have a
checkout).

https://github.com/ahupp/python-magic/tree/libmagic-compat

Changes:
- disable the deprecation warning. this wouldn't actually show
anything by default unless you run python with the warning enabled
(-Wd), but until there's a clear plan for the future of this package
it seems premature to declare deprecation.
- fix the lack of `package` entry in setup.py
- various typos in the README
- fix the libmagic test under python3.  this is actually a bug in the
libmagic python bindings but I'd rather not make changes there.

On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 4:19 AM, Christoph Biedl
<debian.axhn@manchmal.in-ulm.de> wrote:
> From the popular series "Leaving fatal mistakes in spite of
> proof-reading three times":
>
> Christoph Biedl wrote...
>
>> Doing a first round of tests showed
>                                        no
>>                                         regressions so far.
>
> You may stop panicking now :)
>
>     Christoph



-- 
Adam Hupp | http://hupp.org/adam/