Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Christoph Biedl Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python,linux.debian.bugs.dist Subject: Re: [tryton-debian] Namespace conflict for python-magic Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2018 20:30:02 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sat Jan 6 19:25:10 2018 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.91 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: DYN_NJABL=SKIP(0) NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 BL_NJABL=SKIP(-1.5) CL_IP_EQ_FROM_MX=-3.1; rate: -6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5gxpn/Q6ypwruk0T" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/15417 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/1515266683@msgid.manchmal.in-ulm.de Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 53 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: Tryton package maintenance in Debian , debian-python , 877849@bugs.debian.org X-Original-Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2018 20:24:51 +0100 X-Original-Message-ID: <1515266683@msgid.manchmal.in-ulm.de> X-Original-References: <20170904174256.40241925@monsterix.mbehrle.de> <1504545692@msgid.manchmal.in-ulm.de> <20170905130017.1eb29221@monsterix.mbehrle.de> <1504628090@msgid.manchmal.in-ulm.de> <20170906102348.6587419c@monsterix.mbehrle.de> <20171005120116.3a92221a@monsterix.mbehrle.de> <20171027144420.5194574a@monsterix.mbehrle.de> <20180101144230.4d40d63f@monsterix.mbehrle.de> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:10022 linux.debian.bugs.dist:873685 --5gxpn/Q6ypwruk0T Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline [ It's getting rather Debian specific, so trimming recipicient list. I'd prefer to discuss this on debian-python but keep me in Cc:, thanks. ] Mathias Behrle wrote... > while approaching the test for relatorio I got aware, that the result won't be > very significant, because relatorio depends anyway on python-magic[pypi]. To > get meaningful results it would be much better to get the compatibility layer > tested with packages depending on python-magic[file-magic]. > What do you think will be the best way? I think best could be to get a prepared > package with the compatibility layer on experimental and to request the > dependencies to give it a try. Sorry for not getting back earlier. My plan is indeed to package [pypi] python-magic and upload to experimental. Then testers could use that version and look for changed behaviour. I'll try to get something done ASAP. Christoph --5gxpn/Q6ypwruk0T Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJaUSKCAAoJEMQsWOtZFJL9OWoQAJI18JIoli3tUeD2dIjU/qRO DqmFfMLqltYzqmXVbLGlOjLM4gL7TW4l+7o1sau/tKRYYXTiA0gwK/7kdNoHXRDv k4iBlFCJKZvdG5oa/HIUQ0TAaLcht3qKaa+RRKte4Fz0Hy8aAD+nZK7iCDpUVFNn tdoA9Nig5cpO2Td8qH67npKuxjZGUfzfNAfILbZMug6o+7G5Ls9c0/xsg4t4Gbmk FI5Gc0S6Zy7yA5qXHzXEFtY5BZ1PspPs2Ruv+FmKmtLpRc5nNjwtwY6AM493El6o nyQ+IWbK8LX9GgDYWP4eJQdN3dRL4V6U0rimC3yhUw4IB+VZtZY9iSjo0s7eUj/6 XgNSRK02LaVrFuu9AHMgF7Z7xlbLgUdtywlwyL6r6jz3s5xNfwK6LHpV5/dGZjoc hHe9iaNMUSZeXsZj0SuSUoaQZI0q7DqAIflZvm+eDZVQUO6xfFMNnqwAhrfF56/8 nWGf+K7S3Z5a3V4hNnasLcCXWbEP4Xbt0BXuQbeV2HySYmEjJF1RJk3QVQDEMvts 95LF4uZk+XGzX7rWWLnyNiFdcI+MDAVoihhXGKtw3Jn30Lp1hRjxcpNDVEtNJ/+u ppi3Itv1+YPwSnOJg/vnEFExvbUjgmbaSSPDGHKI7c8JBM3L6SbtEoH+JWJwnMOs JcGj45YJ1Gq2Bb7SHjdi =VAGB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5gxpn/Q6ypwruk0T--