Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.unit0.net!news.panservice.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Andreas Tille Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Python 3 Statsmodels & Pandas Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 23:00:03 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue Sep 26 20:57:39 2017 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.981 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate:hard: -6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/15240 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20170926205719.55nwgvoy5je4wiuv@an3as.eu Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 40 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: Yaroslav Halchenko , debian-science@lists.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Original-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 22:57:19 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: <20170926205719.55nwgvoy5je4wiuv@an3as.eu> X-Original-References: <999FD731-B9FF-4C58-8ADD-1A0D6AE2EE03@onerussian.com> <1506031417.8283.21.camel@ghic.org> <20170922022453.j4lmbuq2ekwuoq2a@hopa.kiewit.dartmouth.edu> <1506057119.13211.6.camel@ghic.org> <1506277450.8802.18.camel@ghic.org> <1506321943.8802.28.camel@ghic.org> <20170925074444.r66acejpfa6f5f4n@an3as.eu> <1506400603.14529.19.camel@ghic.org> <20170926070214.jygpoikxmpxm42hx@an3as.eu> <1506450977.360.23.camel@ghic.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:9858 Hi Diane, On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 11:36:17AM -0700, Diane Trout wrote: > > BTW, I'd love if you would merge your work to master branch. I'm a > > bit > > confused by the amount of branches and lost track which one to look > > at. > > I verified which was which and deleted the obsolete branch. > > use detrout-python3-try2 (the only detrout branch that should be left) Thanks. Just let me know if you want me to try rebuilding your work. > > This reminds me to the debian/README.source files ftpmaster once > > suggested for R packages[1]. May be that's an apropriate way to > > document the licenses? Feel free to find examples for instance > > in the package r-cran-ape. > > I really wish that listing the citation for these early scientific > datasets counted as complying with the license. Since it is accepted for the R packages and the data are refering to R data I do not see any reason why this should not be accepted. As far as I understood Yaroslav he agrees with me that if all fails patching the docs to not use the data would be a temporary solution otherwise. While I have not tried to build the current status I wonder what you think about #873512. I'm perfectly fine with your solution to exclude some tests - I just wanted to give a hint that there is a potential upstream patch. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de