Path: csiph.com!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!feeders.as203319.net!feeder01.as203319.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Andreas Tille Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Python 3 Statsmodels & Pandas Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 09:50:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: Diane Trout X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Mon Sep 25 07:45:04 2017 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.001 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate:hard: -6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/15231 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20170925074444.r66acejpfa6f5f4n@an3as.eu Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 27 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: Yaroslav Halchenko , debian-science@lists.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Original-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 09:44:44 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: <20170925074444.r66acejpfa6f5f4n@an3as.eu> X-Original-References: <1505711658.1083.20.camel@ghic.org> <167334734.77WkzDjbVa@jatayu> <20170921142257.6gupvrivzy7i4kjy@an3as.eu> <1506030538.8283.18.camel@ghic.org> <999FD731-B9FF-4C58-8ADD-1A0D6AE2EE03@onerussian.com> <1506031417.8283.21.camel@ghic.org> <20170922022453.j4lmbuq2ekwuoq2a@hopa.kiewit.dartmouth.edu> <1506057119.13211.6.camel@ghic.org> <1506277450.8802.18.camel@ghic.org> <1506321943.8802.28.camel@ghic.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:9849 Hi Diane, On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 11:45:43PM -0700, Diane Trout wrote: > The remaining issues are: > > * Some of the doc pages call get_rdataset, and there's no network > access in the builder so those calls fail. (ugliest error) Can you pre-fetch the data and provide it in debian/datasets? > * There's a lintian warning about no bindnow. I would ignore this for the moment. > * there's one intersphinx reference that's not in debian. If it is not very important I would probably exclude the piece of documentation which is affected. What exact reference is this? Can we help by packaging something else that might be needed later not only inside the docs but also in code? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de