Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Diane Trout Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Docs only packages? Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2017 19:40:01 +0200 Message-ID: X-Original-To: debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sun Sep 24 17:35:25 2017 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-7 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -6.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.24.5-3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/15222 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/1506274506.8802.11.camel@ghic.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 15 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2017 10:35:06 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: <1506274506.8802.11.camel@ghic.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:9840 Hi, I was updating the intersphinx inventory files for statsmodels and one was a link to: 'pydagogue' : ('http://matthew-brett.github.io/pydagogue/', None), Source: https://github.com/matthew-brett/pydagogue In theory we could have a documentation only package which would let whatever statsmodels links were using that site resolve without network access. What do people think about having documentation only packages? Diane