Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Yuri D'Elia Newsgroups: linux.debian.bugs.dist,linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Bug#729956: Forwarded upstream Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 22:40:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org Wed Sep 6 20:39:12 2017 Old-Return-Path: X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.2 Reply-To: Yuri D'Elia , 729956@bugs.debian.org Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-Cc: Debian Science Maintainers X-Debian-Pr-Message: followup 729956 X-Debian-Pr-Package: src:statsmodels X-Debian-Pr-Source: statsmodels X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 8; hammy, 146; neutral, 36; spammy, 1. spammytokens:0.976-+--Great hammytokens:0.000-+--UD:anonscm.debian.org, 0.000-+--sk:anonscm, 0.000-+--anonscm.debian.org, 0.000-+--anonscmdebianorg, 0.000-+--H*r:sk:wavexx@ User-Agent: mu4e 0.9.19; emacs 26.0.50 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Debian-Message: from BTS X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1402180 List-ID: List-URL: Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 18 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: Debian Science List , debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Original-Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 22:35:57 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: <87fubzef9u.fsf@wavexx.thregr.org> X-Original-References: <1384861181.23137.1.camel@debiousci.pietrobattiston.it> <20170906150846.x3g3iz7qsiiclz57@an3as.eu> <87bmmn26i2.fsf@wavexx.thregr.org> <20170906202443.x46qk7jnffznsyxa@an3as.eu> <1384861181.23137.1.camel@debiousci.pietrobattiston.it> <20170906202443.x46qk7jnffznsyxa@an3as.eu> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.bugs.dist:848399 linux.debian.maint.python:9790 On Wed, Sep 06 2017, Andreas Tille wrote: > Great. What about sending a patch with your changes to the bug > report? I've added a branch debian-python3 to I always built from source, not with the debian packaging. > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/statsmodels.git > > but the build failed (for other reasons). I'd willing to work on this > but I definitely need help since I'm lacking the needed Python > knowledge. Hum, I always assumed the consensus on python packages was to manage them with git-dpm, which is something I cannot digest (and has stopped me from contributing more). But just to confirm, I see that statsmodels is just using git-buildpackage?