Path: csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.datemas.de!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Yuri D'Elia Newsgroups: linux.debian.bugs.dist,linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Bug#729956: git-dpm (was Re: Bug#729956: Forwarded upstream) Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 23:20:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org Wed Sep 6 21:18:13 2017 Old-Return-Path: X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.2 Reply-To: Yuri D'Elia , 729956@bugs.debian.org Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-Cc: Debian Science Maintainers X-Debian-Pr-Message: followup 729956 X-Debian-Pr-Package: src:statsmodels X-Debian-Pr-Source: statsmodels X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 11; hammy, 138; neutral, 34; spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--alioth, 0.000-+--CCed, 0.000-+--H*r:sk:wavexx@, 0.000-+--DPMT, 0.000-+--sk:gitbui User-Agent: mu4e 0.9.19; emacs 26.0.50 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Debian-Message: from BTS X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1402194 List-ID: List-URL: Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 19 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: 729956@bugs.debian.org, Debian Science List , debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Original-Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 23:16:13 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: <87efrjedj6.fsf@wavexx.thregr.org> X-Original-References: <1384861181.23137.1.camel@debiousci.pietrobattiston.it> <20170906150846.x3g3iz7qsiiclz57@an3as.eu> <87bmmn26i2.fsf@wavexx.thregr.org> <20170906202443.x46qk7jnffznsyxa@an3as.eu> <87fubzef9u.fsf@wavexx.thregr.org> <20170906205007.2pugvkvlo77n7stc@an3as.eu> <1384861181.23137.1.camel@debiousci.pietrobattiston.it> <20170906205007.2pugvkvlo77n7stc@an3as.eu> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.bugs.dist:848408 linux.debian.maint.python:9792 On Wed, Sep 06 2017, Andreas Tille wrote: >> But just to confirm, I see that statsmodels is just using >> git-buildpackage? > > Yes. Ok, that's reassuring. I'll have a look at the packaging, since I'm already on alioth. But since DPMT is CC-ed (I normally follow via gmane), I take the occasion to say that I _really_ _REALLY_ wished the recommendation on git-dpm to be reconsidered, or at least relaxed. For a newcomer, git-dpm is overkill and underdocumented. From an outsider, making a Debian package already looks daunting. git-dpm does not help. On the other hand, git-buildpackage is a relatively smooth progression from quilt, and it does provide some added convenience.