Path: csiph.com!news.redatomik.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Ole Streicher Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: MBF for deprecating Python2 usage Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2017 21:20:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue Aug 8 19:15:09 2017 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.999 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -7 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 23 X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/15125 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/87poc5yjib.fsf@debian.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2017 20:58:04 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: <87poc5yjib.fsf@debian.org> X-Original-References: <3109A909-3338-4717-BFD2-D65E9206FD7F@debian.org> <9614BFBC-E260-48A6-B722-DDD41E715A20@kitterman.com> <92E6FF73-391C-45FE-A213-6AAED284629D@debian.org> <1502142757.2351.35.camel@ghic.org> <690EAE7E-8005-4723-891E-C2E30C3B35AD@debian.org> <85shh3lzp1.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <1502149701.2351.60.camel@ghic.org> <85inhyn8zk.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <854ltin6q1.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <1502161900.2351.65.camel@ghic.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:9744 Diane Trout writes: >> What I am opposing is the suggestion to install, in the near to >> medium >> term, a command of exactly the same name that has subtly similar but >> incompatible behaviour, when that behaviour *already* has a command – >> ‘python3’ – that is widely used by those who need it. >> > > my problem with that plan is all of the printed documentation saying to > learn python, type "python". All *actual* printed documentation? Which refers to Python 3? Could you give an example here? Otherwise, (if using a Python 2 book), one of the next steps would be "print 'hello world'", and nothing would prevent from the horrible experience that the book is outdated anyway. Sorry, I don't see the problem with "printed documentation". Best regards Ole