Path: csiph.com!news.redatomik.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Ben Finney Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: MBF for deprecating Python2 usage Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2017 08:20:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue Aug 8 06:19:08 2017 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.106 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FOURLA=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RDNS_NONE=0.793] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate:hard: -6.1 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Lines: 22 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) X-Public-Key-ID: 0xAC128405 X-Public-Key-Fingerprint: 517C F14B B2F3 98B0 CB35 4855 B8B2 4C06 AC12 8405 X-Public-Key-URL: http://www.benfinney.id.au/contact/bfinney-pubkey.asc X-Post-From: Ben Finney Cancel-Lock: sha1:Dxe+85cZdOKW1Qk980sXKxbOybc= X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/15124 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/85a83algzp.fsf@benfinney.id.au Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2017 16:18:34 +1000 X-Original-Message-ID: <85a83algzp.fsf@benfinney.id.au> X-Original-References: <9614BFBC-E260-48A6-B722-DDD41E715A20@kitterman.com> <92E6FF73-391C-45FE-A213-6AAED284629D@debian.org> <1502142757.2351.35.camel@ghic.org> <690EAE7E-8005-4723-891E-C2E30C3B35AD@debian.org> <85shh3lzp1.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <1502149701.2351.60.camel@ghic.org> <85inhyn8zk.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <854ltin6q1.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <1502161900.2351.65.camel@ghic.org> <20170808052035.vx2j76cr2wugln3i@virgil.dodds.net> X-Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:9743 Steve Langasek writes: > FWIW I don't share Ben's concern about this being a "backwards > incompatible" change (who is relying on the precise contents of the > banner when running 'python' interactively?!). That's not a backward incompatibility anyone would seriously rely on, and I don't have that concern. The backward incompatibility I'm concerned about is: to have ‘python’, which today invokes Python 2 and some uncountable number of scripts rely on, change on a near-to-medium future upgrade to instead invoke the backward-incompatible Python 3 hence breaking those scripts. Merely noting a change in the interactive prompt's banner is, I agree, inconsequential by comparison. So that's not the objection. -- \ “All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more | `\ robust, sophisticated, and well supported in logic and argument | _o__) than others.” —Douglas Adams | Ben Finney