Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Jeremy Stanley Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2017 18:10:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sun Aug 6 16:02:42 2017 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.901 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -6.1 X-Greylist: delayed 1473 seconds by postgrey-1.35 at bendel; Sun, 06 Aug 2017 16:02:29 UTC MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MH3L82yXXT9lpfRy" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Sa-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:4802:7801:102:be76:4eff:fe20:63e0 X-Sa-Exim-Rcpt-To: debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Sa-Exim-Mail-From: fungi@yuggoth.org X-Sa-Exim-Scanned: No (on azathoth.yuggoth.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/15086 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20170806153751.GW2409@yuggoth.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 57 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 15:37:51 +0000 X-Original-Message-ID: <20170806153751.GW2409@yuggoth.org> X-Original-References: Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:9705 --MH3L82yXXT9lpfRy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2017-08-06 10:44:36 -0400 (-0400), Allison Randal wrote: > The OpenStack packaging team has been sprinting at DebCamp, and > we're finally ready to move all general Python dependencies for > OpenStack over to DPMT. (We'll keep maintaining them, just within > DPMT using the DPMT workflow.) >=20 > After chatting with tumbleweed, the current suggestion is that we > should migrate the packages straight into gbp pq instead of making > an intermediate stop with git-dpm. [...] More a personal curiosity on my part (I'm now a little disappointed that I didn't make time to attend), but are you planning to leverage pristine tarballs as part of this workflow shift so you can take advantage of the version details set in the sdist metadata and the detached OpenPGP signatures provided upstream? Or are you sticking with operating on a local fork of upstream Git repositories (and generating intermediate sdists on the fly or supplying version data directly from the environment via debian/rules)? I'm eager to see what upstream release management features you're taking advantage of so we can better know which of those efforts are valuable to distro package maintainers. --=20 Jeremy Stanley --MH3L82yXXT9lpfRy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJZhzfPXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ5N0FFNDk2RkMwMkRFQzlGQzM1M0IyRTc0 OEY5OTYxMTQzNDk1ODI5AAoJEEj5lhFDSVgpE0cP/jcUaV1AiUHlgvyjW8LtCiuI qfwPB0yqWONwp+S+3OPpIF/5fEqB0P9b0cVLFqESY4nS+7dBxRxXIAwT7nSKs5Ag WJP0ywNgVTIyEFLKLd/7KazQv1YUp/6LL/VKhOxaFtT9SWfLMRM+vsL2fT2AzdH0 qHvCGfRZcKP0FX5IMpXNkTjrUAuuWHvoedWFaPIgAEkTVgkOpd9i7ghtSGgfyVM9 9zB7Q+t52iX2BIl8nE92F2WNWejfptg4Yaprxvm5dfks4Prmwwrw9gSkYH0KLBPj rfV6/uGgqGFEYCvso4tEYmRoRr2Hw6MLCqpyuVVtbFz5Bk2AZRXmekTW+Kmt1/Ok HvjlsnNEsXXVWdqoDtVIT1ngF0f2aJINRNAOOCcy5aHsXOsu8osTyYJ5i1w8JuJJ vX9Um6RhOcoAbBxBDS+U361/Hg/rJqpe11JKLQ1K6QLvzYh2KJLQ5dUVMAbP7tbg SK+SsybzCoKXNlGK7jOzF+EPeqkuN5tB4IJL4rdDVTK9yUgmGh1omz6fGZaDhuwV PViRTD0E0SjUZD8mcjKlqqZmcgbyIdQv62giWVQKOq0rG6MttrcKkDQiuOZFPHHJ XrxmEgC+5pc0W0cVUnD34IuqG9ttvKEJ4JTpzG01oasQkcLqSoQGlvjKdoEa11wf vYWCdfR6iS1MNLa9Nsgn =AuLo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MH3L82yXXT9lpfRy--