Path: csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!news.unit0.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From: Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com>
Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python
Subject: Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2017 01:20:01 +0200
Message-ID: <ubZtv-7j5-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
References: <ubvc6-3xe-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <ubwhP-4rV-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <ubwBc-4yy-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <ubytk-5JT-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <ubyWl-5Tz-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <ubYxr-6GZ-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Old-Return-Path: <debian@kitterman.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Approved: robomod@news.nic.it
Lines: 17
Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender: robomod@news.nic.it
Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:9727



On August 7, 2017 5:37:34 PM EDT, Diane Trout <diane@ghic=2Eorg> wrote:
>
>>=20
>> Why would you need to repack a tarball just because it contains
>> prebuilt docs (non-DFSG-free licensed documentation aside)? I'm all
>
>I've occasionally repacked a tarball because upstream included minified
>jquery or mathjax=2E
>
>Diane

Those are sourceless binary blobs, so repacking for that is exactly correc=
t=2E

Scott K