Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Gordon Ball Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: RFS: jupyter components Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 22:30:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Wed Oct 25 20:28:00 2017 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.3 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -6.1 X-Greylist: delayed 730 seconds by postgrey-1.36 at bendel; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 20:27:47 UTC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-AU Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/15333 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/355b6439-e11f-a83b-a4bb-2e04cbe76fc0@chronitis.net Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 52 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 22:15:29 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: <355b6439-e11f-a83b-a4bb-2e04cbe76fc0@chronitis.net> X-Original-References: <528e00e5-4cdc-31dc-2926-ed6d986d2de6@le-vert.net> <2f1a6b91-b7fd-004d-9285-6dea17f6a129@chronitis.net> <1508958105.19198.11.camel@ghic.org> <193be202-9c59-08a5-74d4-c5a8bffb6ad2@laposte.net> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:9950 On 25/10/17 21:51, Julien Puydt wrote: > Hi, > > Le 25/10/2017 à 21:01, Diane Trout a écrit : >> >>> I have just uploaded the current RFS packages (ipython, >>> jupyter-notebook, jupyter-console, nbconvert) to mentors.d.n >> >> I just reviewed nbconvert Thanks for looking! >> >> I got one lintian warning >> >> nbconvert source: timewarp-standards-version (2017-09-03 < 2017-09-27) >> >> The source package refers to a Standards-Version that was released >> after the date of the most recent debian/changelog entry. Perhaps you >> forgot to update the timestamp in debian/changelog before building the >> package? I would normally not update the timestamp while the suite is UNRELEASED, and expect whoever ultimately makes the upload to `dch -r` and tag the release, but maybe it would be less ambiguous to update it each time d/changelog gets edited. >> >> Would anyone who worked on preparing the release like to update the >> changelog timestamp? >> >> Also it's probably a good idea not push the debian/5.3.1-1 tag for the >> release until its actually accepted. There's a couple of commits after >> the tag which are in the package on mentors. >> >> Will go look at the other packages in a bit. > > I removed the offending tag and updated the changelog timestamp. > > According to "who-permits-upload nbconvert", I might be able to dput > myself... tell me if you want me to. > For my part I think it is ready. I think I have DM upload rights for jupyter-notebook but not the others listed. > Thanks for the review! > > Snark on irc.debian.org >