Path: csiph.com!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news.unit0.net!news.panservice.it!diesel.cu.mi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From: Elena ``of Valhalla'' <elena.valhalla@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: linux.debian.bugs.dist,linux.debian.maint.python
Subject: Bug#834768: RFS: codicefiscale/0.9-1
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 16:10:01 +0200
Message-ID: <s8f8d-445-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
References: <s7BDP-44A-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <s7C6R-4ty-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <s7DYZ-5Cw-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <s7YTL-1Yp-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <s7Z3r-21V-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Old-Return-Path: <debbugs@buxtehude.debian.org>
Reply-To: Elena ``of Valhalla'' <elena.valhalla@gmail.com>, 834768@bugs.debian.org
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-Cc: Debian Mentors <package-sponsorship-requests@lists.debian.org>, Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org>
Mail-Followup-To: 834768@bugs.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cgyctlmpxvjqfjyt"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.2-neo (2016-07-23)
Approved: robomod@news.nic.it
Lines: 67
Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender: robomod@news.nic.it
Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.bugs.dist:761174 linux.debian.maint.python:8801


--cgyctlmpxvjqfjyt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 2017-08-19 at 20:54:34 +0000, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> No, it just means that I rashed too much at reviewing it last night and
> was already sleeping.
> I didn't notice all those files where inside a directory -.-'

lol :)

> > That's exactly the issue, I've added a comment with a pointer to=20
> > https://github.com/ema/pycodicefiscale/issues/6
> The project doesn't strike me as very active, but thanks :)

Well, the scope of the project is quite limited, and it its feature set
is basically complete or nearly so, so the lack of commit activity
doesn't worry me.

Around the time when I opened that issue I also proposed a (small) pull
request to add python3 support and that one was accepted in a very short
time, so the project didn't look abandoned.

https://github.com/ema/pycodicefiscale/pull/5

> > > * just quickly skimming over the README, I think it would make sense =
to
> > >   include in the binaries, as it provides quick documentation (I thin=
k)
> >=20
> > yes, it does, you're right (added in git)
> [...]
> This is not going to do what you expect, check both the produced
> binaries ;)

yeah, that did exactly half of what I expected :)

should be fixed now (also in git)

> (`debc` right after having built the package is handy for that, I run
> it in a pbuilder hook for example)

Thanks. I currently check packages with lintian (--pedantic) and
piuparts, and I sort-of-know-but-still-don't-use check-all-the-things:
is there something else I should/can add to the list?

--=20
Elena ``of Valhalla''

--cgyctlmpxvjqfjyt
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXuGOVAAoJEFmsFkaYr//lFHQH/A4k0cKRDG6y+j30uQO3Flh8
rf05yPhKvGxVAgwN73lOhUKDJ71ZKXWc0UkqRcO1bbJY8IyWeaMevt8hVadqetHe
W18j6tJXWnpcaSvFpWKwi77ovQUbShXSq+HZcbLNJFsAhhO930gL4wZDD0xVSvj4
A8T1ShxTO08tCNPkNX2rW+wTilLd3YzlcJr+dckwZROuhV5UIARsQCR2h40bcgNJ
m5Ft8QJEq93Bb19H7CGYZErDkemJdiq6w65lbTKJFyUZ9wB5Ycbxm8weSI9Jwgkt
hEv0/4+ROjkm1FwhN7Zfhiu53oWYIa1BQNTN105r5yg6ROWjYGr4o1R5pYgAllo=
=cVrk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--cgyctlmpxvjqfjyt--