Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: =?utf-8?B?2KPYrdmF2K8g2KfZhNmF2K3ZhdmI2K/Zig==?= Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Should cocotb & pyuvm be under Electronics or Python team ? Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 01:00:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: Agathe Porte X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue Jul 25 22:57:37 2023 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.39 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, BODY_8BITS=1.5, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, WORD_WITHOUT_VOWELS=1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -4.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8+74qwmUvVX309i6" Content-Disposition: inline X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/20978 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20230725225712.GU3617326@bogus Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 52 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org, Pkg-electronics-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net X-Original-Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 00:57:12 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: <20230725225712.GU3617326@bogus> X-Original-References: <20230722235611.GT3617326@bogus> <20230723110139.xnzfusybex62nbxy@dellice.lan> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:15062 --8+74qwmUvVX309i6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 01:01:39PM +0200, Agathe Porte wrote: > From my quick look at cocotb=E2=80=99s documentation [3], it seems to shi= p at > least one binary in $PATH named `cocotb-config`. Here is how it could be > packaged: >=20 > - `cocotb` srcpkg in `electronics` section; > - `python3-cocotb` binpkg in `python` section, containing the library; > - `cocotb` binpkg in `electronics` section, Depends on `python3-cocotb` > and contains the executables. ---end quoted text--- Well, I am reluctant to separate the python module from the binary, as=20 the python module doesn't seem to be useful without the binary. I've got another issue, that is cocotb requires find_libppython module,=20 which is used to find libpython on the system, so should I package=20 find_libpython, which doesn't seem to be needed on Debian, just for the=20 sake of cocotb ? Or should I just patch cocotb and put some simplified code= (tailored for Debian) that finds path to libpython ? --=20 =E2=80=8E=D8=A3=D8=AD=D9=85=D8=AF =D8=A7=D9=84=D9=85=D8=AD=D9=85=D9=88=D8= =AF=D9=8A (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy) Digital design engineer GPG KeyIDs: 4096R/A7EF5671 2048R/EDDDA1B7 GPG Fingerprints: 6E2E E4BB 72E2 F417 D066 6ABF 7B30 B496 A7EF 5761 8206 A196 2084 7E6D 0DF8 B176 BC19 6A94 EDDD A1B7 --8+74qwmUvVX309i6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEggahliCEfm0N+LF2vBlqlO3dobcFAmTAU0UACgkQvBlqlO3d obeMcAf/U4lXBUyLVUrEQpHWOzQD8SrIDvQ+OGc5DXXQxzrIh9aiADDpgoz3gCmc XopnwEybreMN5C7GvnOECRdIWnopj/fzf9JmaHWX07bQnYHpL2aCfzJ2q6LSs0EI Y5JD4NLHlRO1Nn21esLkkVGPV8dpj0dafp4a4bXnhGiH7DGlnECto0juVprmc6mT eRRzkDRwp7iY+sFnO0C/vu7Zlm12xKnKsaHde/CIgK8+DrRn2FpNuzuGRu8A4H/C GGiUiVwWy4x5sXgTfBCX08GgvsSHqyIWmt6QOosPrqMVTxjDDdCLjPtcNcr1ZeEG Zn9WATW4VSXlKP0RfUUH/9WqMijdtw== =fpDG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8+74qwmUvVX309i6--