Path: csiph.com!1.us.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: build package xrayutilities - wheel and pip with setuptools Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 09:20:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Mon Oct 31 08:15:12 2022 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=0.019 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, THREADTOPIC=2] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .synchrotron-soleil. - helo: .smtpout01-ext2.partage.renater. - helo-domain: .renater.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2; rate: -5.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.8.15_GA_4372 (zclient/8.8.15_GA_4372) Thread-Topic: build package xrayutilities - wheel and pip with setuptools Thread-Index: ciejZ2Ni5EBs/dyzPQa2PvP3A26uhQ== X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Renater-Ptge-Spamstate: clean X-Renater-Ptge-Spamscore: -100 X-Renater-Ptge-Spamcause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvgedruddvgddutdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucftgffptefvgfftnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvvefkjghfufggtgfgofhtsehtjegttdertdejnecuhfhrohhmpefrkfevveetucfhrhgvuggvrhhitgdqgfhmmhgrnhhuvghluceofhhrvgguvghrihgtqdgvmhhmrghnuhgvlhdrphhitggtrgesshihnhgthhhrohhtrhhonhdqshholhgvihhlrdhfrheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepuedvveeiuddtfefgjedtjefgtddutefhieeuteehtdegjeffkedtgeekheefjedunecuffhomhgrihhnpeguvggsihgrnhdrohhrghenucfkphepuddtrddvheegrddvgedtrddugeehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehinhgvthepuddtrddvheegrddvgedtrddugeehpdhhvghlohepiihsthhorhgvqdgsfedqtdduvddrphgrrhhtrghgvgdrrhgvnhgrthgvrhdrfhhrpdhmrghilhhfrhhomheprffkveevtecuhfhrvgguvghrihgtqdfgmhhmrghnuhgvlhcuoehfrhgvuggvrhhitgdqvghmmhgrnhhuvghlrdhpihgttggrsehshihntghhrhhothhrohhnqdhsohhlvghilhdrfhhrqedpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepvddprhgtphhtthhopegtrdhstghhohgvnhgvrhhtsehtqdhonhhlihhnvgdruggvpdhrtghpthhtohep uggvsghirghnqdhphihthhhonheslhhishhtshdruggvsghirghnrdhorhhg X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/20422 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/30228327.20577084.1667203068020.JavaMail.zimbra@synchrotron-soleil.fr Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 42 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Original-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 08:57:48 +0100 (CET) X-Original-Message-ID: <30228327.20577084.1667203068020.JavaMail.zimbra@synchrotron-soleil.fr> X-Original-References: <752405ea3d71e3569b69a4ae7244f037@debian.org> <96125739-83B8-44CE-B4A7-487C885386FB@kitterman.com> <4157b139e5b7323abaea6c19854bf55f@debian.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:14570 > Hello Frederic, Hello Carsten > please could you provide next time direct links to the VCS/Tracker of > your package, that prevents time to search for the correct package on my > or others people side. Also a speaking subject content is helping me to > decide if I want to spend time on taking a look, you've choose a very > generic line. :-) ack > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/xrayutilities > https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/python-xrayutilities > No as you have overwritten the default target by a call that is quite > similar to the original pybuild call. > Yes, the environment isn't the same for the second call, you'd need to > ensure that the build directory is clean before starting the second run. > But I don't see why this construct you've build in d/rules is needed > that way. ok > I can build the package basically doing these modifications and by > adding the additional B-D package Scott did mention. Simply let > dh_sphinxdoc build the documentation and adding the additional needed > package dependencies. [your patch] In your proposition you removed the arch/indep split, is it on purpose ? > lintian has some additional remarks any way, I haven't looked further at > these. ok Cheers Fred