Path: csiph.com!1.us.feeder.erje.net!3.us.feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Carsten Schoenert Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: build package xrayutilities - wheel and pip with setuptools Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 18:30:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Mon Oct 31 17:26:28 2022 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.978 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .t-online. - helo: .mailout05.t-online. - helo-domain: .t-online.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2; rate: -5.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.3.3 Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Toi-Expurgateid: 150726::1667237166-3AFEA81E-D9902829/0/0 CLEAN NORMAL X-Toi-Msgid: 0d1aa276-be96-4dba-8065-2859e3dc8b70 X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/20424 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/bd5e4ab4-d7f3-74c8-b25d-f55acf0e2125@t-online.de Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 19 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 18:26:03 +0100 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <752405ea3d71e3569b69a4ae7244f037@debian.org> <96125739-83B8-44CE-B4A7-487C885386FB@kitterman.com> <4157b139e5b7323abaea6c19854bf55f@debian.org> <30228327.20577084.1667203068020.JavaMail.zimbra@synchrotron-soleil.fr> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:14572 Hello Frederic, Am 31.10.22 um 08:57 schrieb PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel: >> I can build the package basically doing these modifications and by >> adding the additional B-D package Scott did mention. Simply let >> dh_sphinxdoc build the documentation and adding the additional needed >> package dependencies. > > [your patch] > > In your proposition you removed the arch/indep split, is it on purpose ? yes, building the Sphinx based documentation doesn't need to be done that (to me fragile) way. debhelper is smart enough to do the right things in the correct order if you tell it to use the sphinxdoc module. -- Regards Carsten